Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Prs Matriculation School vs The Tahsildar on 30 September, 2021

Author: S.M.Subramaniam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam

                                                                                WP No.1738 of 2016

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED : 30-09-2021

                                                         CORAM

                              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                                    WP No.1738 of 2016
                                                          And
                                                    WMP No.1520 of 2016


                     PRS Matriculation School,
                     Represented by its Correspondence,
                     Mrs.R.Padmavathi                                  ..      Petitioner

                                                            vs.

                     The Tahsildar,
                     Maduravoil Taluk,
                     Maduravoil,
                     Thiruvallur District.                             ..      Respondent

                                   Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the
                     respondent herein to issue a public building certificate under Form D as
                     envisaged under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Public Building (Licensing)
                     Act, 1963 to the petitioner institution without insisting the NOC from
                     TNHB.


                                   For Petitioner                 : Mr.Adithya Reddy

                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                                   WP No.1738 of 2016



                                   For Respondent                 : Mr.C.Kathiravan,
                                                                    Government Advocate.

                                                         ORDER

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondent herein to issue a public building certificate under Form D as envisaged under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Public Building (Licensing) Act, 1963 to the petitioner institution without insisting the NOC from TNHB.

2. The petitioner states that the petitioner is Matriculation School and they are complying with the norms and conditions stipulated by the Education Department. Under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Public Building (Licensing) Act, 1963, the structural soundness of the buildings are to be certified by the approved Panel of Engineers, so as to confirm the structural soundness of the buildings. The petitioner made an application and the Authority Competent insisted for 'No Objection Certificate' (NOC) to purchase from the Tamil Nadu Housing Board. Thus, the petitioner is constrained to move the present writ petition. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ WP No.1738 of 2016

3. The respondent-Tahsildar filed counter-affidavit stating that perusal of the revenue records reveal that the land in Survey No.226/1 of Ramapuram Village in which the PRS Matriculation School (petitioner) is functioning stands in the name of the Tamil Nadu Housing Board (TNHB). Therefore, the petitioner has to get necessary NOC from TNHB and without verifying the title of the property, 'Form D' is not relevant to take further action. Accordingly, the petitioner was asked to produce necessary NOC from the TNHB in proceedings dated 18.09.2015.

4. It is further contended that the title of the property in which the acquisition building is not in the name of the petitioner and is in the name of the Correspondent. The title vested with the TNHB. Thus, the dispute regarding the ownership/title of the property, is to be adjudicated between the parties. If at all the petitioner claims that they are the owners, then it is to be established by producing the relevant documents and evidences.

5. As per the revenue records, the property stands in the name of the TNHB. Under these circumstances, the respondent is right in not 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ WP No.1738 of 2016 considering the application submitted by the petitioner.

6. Curiously the petitioner has not even impleaded the TNHB in this writ petition for the reasons best known to the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is of an opinion that this order must be communicated to the Tamil Nadu Housing Board, in view of the fact that the petitioner is availing ownership and contrarily, the Tahsildar says that the ownership stands in the name of TNHB. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to communicate the copy of this order to the Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035.

7. In view of the fact that the petitioner has not established any right for the grant of relief, as such, sought for in the present writ petition.

8. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

30-09-2021 Index : Yes/No. Internet : Yes/No. Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order.

Svn 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ WP No.1738 of 2016 To

1.The Tahsildar, Maduravoil Taluk, Maduravoil, Thiruvallur District.

2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035.

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ WP No.1738 of 2016 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Svn WP 1738 of 2016 30-09-2021 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/