Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 13, Cited by 0]

Allahabad High Court

Umesh Nagar vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 3 March, 2020

Author: Harsh Kumar

Bench: Harsh Kumar





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 79
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28935 of 2018
 
Applicant :- Umesh Nagar
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Sharma
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
WITH
 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25312 of 2018
 
Applicant :- Sant Ram Singh And 5 Ors
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Sharma
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Santosh Kumar Singh
 
WITH
 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27125 of 2018
 
Applicant :- Dr.Umesh Kumar Nagar And 3 Others
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Sharma
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Santosh Kumar Singh
 
WITH 
 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 981 of 2019
 
Applicant :- Smt. Priyanka Singh
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Harsh Kumar,J.
 

As per office report dated 3.3.2020 this Court has also jurisdiction to decide the Application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. No.981 of 2019.

Heard Sri Vivek Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.

The Applications under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Nos.28935 of 2018 and 25312 of 2018 have been filed for quashing the charge-sheet dated 13.9.2017 as well as entire proceeding of Criminal Case No.2497 of 2017 (State Vs. Umesh Nagar & others) arising out of Case Crime No.0139 of 2016, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Amroha pending in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division)(FTC), Amroha.

The Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No.27125 of 2018 has been filed for quashing the summoning order dated 19.1.2018 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Hasanpur, District Amroha in Complaint Case No.569 of 2017, under Section 406 I.P.C., P.S. Adampur, District Amroha as well as for quashing of further proceedings of Complaint Case No.569 of 2017 pending before Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Hasanpur, District Amroha.

The Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No.981 of 2019 has been filed for quashing the summoning order dated 12.10.2018 in Complaint Case No.912 of 2017 (Dr. Umesh Nagar Vs. Smt. Priyanka) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar, under Section 406 I.P.C., P.S. Badalpur, District Gautam Budh Nagar.

Learned counsel for parties submits that there were matrimonial dispute between Smt. Priyanka Singh and her husband Dr. Umesh Kumar Nagar; that Application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. Nos.28935 of 2018 and 25312 of 2018 have been filed by husband and in-laws of Smt. Priyanka Singh for quashing the proceedings of Case Crime No.0139 of 2016, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act while Application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. No.27125 of 2018 has been filed by them for quashing the proceedings of Complaint Case No.569 of 2017; that husband of Smt. Priyanka Singh also lodged a false complaint case against Smt. Priyanka Singh and she has filed Application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. No.981 of 2019 for quashing the proceedings of Complaint Case No.912 of 2017; that matter was referred to Mediation & Re-conciliation Centre, High Court, Allahabad and vide agreement dated 10.7.2019, which is on the record of Application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. No.981 of 2019, parties have settled the dispute amicably and have decided to live separately.

Parties' counsel further submits that petition for mutual Divorce No.162 of 2019 under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act has been filed by husband and wife in view of term 6-C of settlement agreement.

Upon hearing counsel for the parties and perusal of record, I find that in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court in the case of B.S. Joshi vs. State of Haryana (2003) 4 SCC 675, since the parties have come to terms by way of settlement agreement, there is no justification to keep the proceedings of cases pending and proceedings of Criminal Case No.2497 of 2017, Complaint Case No.569 of 2017 and Complaint Case No.912 of 2017, are liable to be quashed.

The applications under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are allowed and the proceedings of Criminal Case No.2497 of 2017, Complaint Case No.569 of 2017 and Complaint Case No.912 of 2017, are quashed, accordingly.

Order Date :- 3.3.2020 Kpy