Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Mr.Rajan Chadha & Anr vs Mr. Sanjay Arora & Anr on 7 December, 2022

Author: Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

Bench: Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

                             $~22
                             *      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                             +      CONT.CAS(C) 75/2021
                                    MR.RAJAN CHADHA & ANR.                             ..... Petitioners
                                                       Through:     Mr Bhuvanesh Sehgal, Mr Akshay
                                                                    Sharma and Mr Dev Batapshehi,
                                                                    Advocates.
                                                       versus

                                    MR. SANJAY ARORA & ANR.                            ..... Respondents
                                                       Through:     Mr Sumeet Kaul, Mr Vignesh Raj,
                                                                    Ms Swechcha Mishra, Advocates
                                                                    with Mr Sanjay Arora, respondent in
                                                                    person for R1.
                                                                    Mr Ishaan Mukherjee, Advocate for
                                                                    R2.
                                    CORAM:
                                    HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH
                                    ARORA
                                                  ORDER

% 07.12.2022

1. Respondent No.1 is present in person in terms of the directions contained in order dated 22.08.2022.

2. Mr Ishaan Mukherjee, Advocate representing the Resolution Professional (RP) has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent no.2 and he states that, if so directed, he can file a reply apprising the Court of the status of the Company.

3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that he does not require any such status report.

4. At the request of the learned counsel for the Respondent No.1, the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD KUMAR VATS Signing Date:12.12.2022 17:43:48 matter is adjourned to 23.03.2023.

5. In the meantime, the RP of Respondent No. 2 shall place on record reports, if any, prepared for the Committee of Creditors with respect to the funds and assets of the company.

6. Respondent no.1 is directed to remain present on the next date of hearing.

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J DECEMBER 7, 2022 pkv Click here to check corrigendum, if any Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD KUMAR VATS Signing Date:12.12.2022 17:43:48