Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Farhan Liyakat Pathan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 16 February, 2021

Author: Sarang V. Kotwal

Bench: Sarang V. Kotwal

                                  :1:                              18-ba-1291-20.odt


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

             CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1291 OF 2020

 Farhan Liyakat Pathan                                .... Applicant

                  Versus

 The State of Maharashtra                             .... Respondent

                                    _____

 Mr. Sachin B. Thorat for Applicant.
 Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for State/Respondent.
                                _____

                                 CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
                                 DATE  : 16th FEBRUARY, 2021

 P.C. :

 1.               The Applicant is seeking his release on bail in

 connection with C.R.No.341 of 2020 registered with Junnar police

 station, Pune, on 05/07/2020, under section 395 of the Indian

 Penal Code (for short 'IPC'). The applicant was arrested on

 08/07/2020 and since then he is in custody.

 2.               Heard Shri. Sachin Thorat, learned counsel for the

 applicant and Shri. Yadav, learned APP for the State.

 3.               In this case the applicant himself had filed an F.I.R.


  Gokhale                                                                       1 of 4




::: Uploaded on - 18/02/2021                 ::: Downloaded on - 18/02/2021 20:52:11 :::
                                   :2:                               18-ba-1291-20.odt


 against unknown persons. It is his case that, on 04/07/2020, he

 had gone to Alephata to collect 900 chickens from a poultry farm.

 He was accompanied by Cleaner Hanjala Pathan and another

 assistant Majhar Shaikh. He sold 200 chickens to one Nasir and

 collected more than Rs.1 lakh. He further sold other chickens and

 collected money. Thus, in all, he had more than Rs.1,44,000/- with

 him and they started coming back to Junnar. At around 11.50p.m.

 in the night his vehicle was intercepted by two motorcycles. Three

 persons intercepted them. He was pulled out of the car, he was

 beaten, his money was taken away and his phone was also taken

 away. On these allegations, this F.I.R. was lodged. Subsequently,

 the investigation took a different turn and the applicant himself,

 though, he had lodged this F.I.R., was shown as an accused and

 was arrested. It was the case of the prosecution that the applicant

 himself gave an information to the actual offenders who removed

 cash after intercepting the vehicle.

 4.               Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that, there

 is absolutely no basis for even suspecting that the applicant was

 involved in this offence. The test identification parade is not held.


                                                                                 2 of 4




::: Uploaded on - 18/02/2021                  ::: Downloaded on - 18/02/2021 20:52:11 :::
                                   :3:                               18-ba-1291-20.odt


 In any case, it would not help the prosecution because there is no

 dispute about the incident having taken place and that the

 applicant was beaten by the offenders. The prosecution case that

 he was the master mind and had arranged for occurrence of this

 incident, is not supported by any other independent evidence.

 There is no recovery from him and there is no other incriminating

 circumstance.

 5.               Learned APP, on the other hand, could not controvert

 the fact that, all other accused are released on bail.

 6.               I have considered these submissions. In this particular

 case, holding of test identification parade, as far as, present

 applicant is concerned is of no use. Other two companions Hanjala

 Pathan and Majhar Shaikh have corroborated the applicant's case

 as to how their vehicle was intercepted and as to how the money

 was taken away. There is no recovery from the present applicant.

 The important factor in this case is that, all other accused are

 granted bail. Therefore, now the investigating agency does not

 have any other independent material against the present applicant.

 The applicant is in custody since 08/07/2020. The investigation is


                                                                                 3 of 4




::: Uploaded on - 18/02/2021                  ::: Downloaded on - 18/02/2021 20:52:11 :::
                                          :4:                                18-ba-1291-20.odt


 over and the charge-sheet is already filed. Further custody of the

 applicant will not serve any purpose. Therefore, I am inclined to

 grant bail to the present applicant.

 7.               Hence, the following order :

                                           ORDER

(i) In connection with C.R.No.341 of 2020 registered with Junnar police station, Pune, the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing PR bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

(ii) Application stands disposed of accordingly.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) 4 of 4 ::: Uploaded on - 18/02/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 18/02/2021 20:52:11 :::