Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Madras High Court

Mrs.S. Anitha vs Tamil Nadu Medical Council on 12 August, 2016

Author: M.Jaichandren

Bench: M.Jaichandren

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE:  12-08-2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN

Writ Petition No.28981 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014


Mrs.S. Anitha 		    			.. Petitioner 
Vs


1.Tamil Nadu Medical Council 
rep. By its Chairperson 
No.914, Poonamallee High Road
Arumbakkam, Chennai-106. 
2.Indian Medical Council 
represented  by its Secretary
Pocket-14. Sector-8, Waraka Phase-1, 
New Delhi-110 077. 
3.Appollo Hospital 
represented  by its Managing Director
No.134, Mint Street, 
(Opp. Raman Kovil)
Sowcarpet, Chennai-79.  
4.Dr.P.S.Prashant
5.The Chief Medical Officer
M/s.Appollo Hospital
No.134, Mint Street
Sowcarpet, Chennai-79. 
(R4 and R5 were impleaded 
as per the order, dated 11.12.2014 
by VRSJ in M.P.No.2 of 2014 
in W.P.No.28981 of 2014)  		                      ... Respondents  


Prayer: The writ petition is filed seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider  the petitioner's representation, dated 20.09.2014 and consequently, direct  the respondents to take necessary action on the third respondent. 

		For Petitioner	  : M/s.N. Subramani  

		For Respondent No.1   : Mr.A.Mohamed Ismail

		For Respondent No.2 : Mr.V.P. Raman 
	
		For Respondents No.3 to 5 : No appearance 



O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned counsels, appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. This writ petition has been filed, praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent concerned to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 20.9.2014, in accordance with law.

3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the first respondent had submitted that the representation of the petitioner, dated 20.9.2014, had already been disposed of by the first respondent.

4. He had further submitted that a copy of the proceedings of the first respondent would be communicated to the petitioner, within a period of ten days, from today.

In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the first respondent, this Court is of the view that no further orders are necessary, in the present writ petition. Hence, the writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P. is also closed.

12.08.2016 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No rnb To

1.Tamil Nadu Medical Council rep. By its Chairperson No.914, Poonamallee High Road Arumbakkam, Chennai-106.

2.Indian Medical Council represented by its Secretary Pocket-14. Sector-8, Waraka Phase-1, New Delhi-110 077.

M.JAICHANDREN,J.

rnb Writ Petition No.28981 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 12-08-2016