Gujarat High Court
Simplex Infrastuctures Limited vs Employees State Insurance Corporation ... on 2 May, 2016
Author: Paresh Upadhyay
Bench: Paresh Upadhyay
C/SCA/5401/2016 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5401 of 2016
==========================================================
SIMPLEX INFRASTUCTURES LIMITED....Petitioner(s)
Versus
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & 1....Respondent(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DIPAK R DAVE, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR HEMANT S SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY
Date : 02/05/2016
ORAL ORDER
1. This Court had issued notice on 06.04.2016. Mr. Hemant S. Shah, learned advocate has entered appearance for respondent authorities and at his request, the matter was adjourned.
2. Learned advocate for the petitioner had pressed all throughout that in view of the order of this Court recorded on Special Civil Application No.18467 of 2015 dated 20.01.2016, the petitioner was entitled to protection against any coercive action.
3. Learned advocate for the respondent authorities had filed sick note on 27.04.2016 and taking note of it, the matter was adjourned to 28.04.2016. On 28.04.2016 also, learned Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Tue May 03 01:31:19 IST 2016 C/SCA/5401/2016 ORDER advocate for the respondent authorities had filed sick note, therefore the matter was adjourned today. Now, it is reported that learned advocate for the respondent authorities has filed leave note for whole of this week and therefore the matter would be required to be adjourned after summer vacation.
4. Under above circumstances, it is ordered that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner.
5. It would be open for the respondent authorities to make alternative arrangement, for representing their case, if so advised.
Direct Service is permitted. It would be open to serve the respondent No.1 by Registered Post.
(PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) mhdave/119 Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Tue May 03 01:31:19 IST 2016