Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Sivakumar vs Ameerunnissa Begum Sahiba Endowment on 6 April, 2026

Author: T.V.Thamilselvi

Bench: T.V.Thamilselvi

                                                                                   CRP No. 2003 of 2026


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                    DATED: 06-04-2026
                                                         CORAM
                                  THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
                                                    CRP No. 2003 of 2026
                                                          AND
                                                   CMP NO. 8912 OF 2026
                M.Sivakumar
                S/O. Late K. Munusamy,
                No.13, Abdul Khader Street,
                Mount Road,
                Chennai - 600002.
                                                                                     ..Petitioner(s)
                                                            Vs
                Ameerunnissa Begum Sahiba Endowment
                Rep. by its President,
                H.M.Muneeb,
                No.76, Pycrofts Road (Bharathi Salai),
                Triplicane,
                Chennai - 600005.
                                                                                   ..Respondent(s)
                PRAYER IN CRP No. 2003 of 2026
                          Civil Revision Petition filed under Sec. 115 of C.P.C., praying to set aside
                the fair and decreetal order dated 05-02-2026 passed in EA.No.4 of 2025 in
                EP.No.3698 of 2022 in OS.No.3189 of 2011 on the file of the X Asst. City Civil
                Court, Chennai.
                PRAYER IN CMP No. 8912 of 2026
                          Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Sec.151 of C.P.C., praying to
                grant interim stay of all further proceedings in EP.No.3698 of 2022 on the file
                of the X Asst.city Civil Court, Chennai.
                              For Petitioner(s):         Mr.S.Giri Tharan

                              For Respondent(s):         Mr.L.Gavaskar




                                                                                           __________
                                                                                            Page1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  CRP No. 2003 of 2026




                                                       ORDER

Challenging the impugned order passed in E.A.No.4 of 2025 in E.P.No. 3698 of 2022 in O.S.No.3189 of 2011 by the learned X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, the Revision Petitioner/2 nd Judgment Debtor preferred this Civil Revision Petition.

2.Before the Executing Court, the Revision Petitioner filed an application under Sec.47 of C.P.C. to dismiss the execution petition. Even before numbering the same, the Executing Court has rejected the application, which was already challenged before this court, wherein, a direction was issued by this court to dispose the application after giving proper opportunity to both parties. Inspite of that, Sec.47 application filed in E.A.No.4 of 2025 was dismissed by the Executing Court in a hurried manner without giving proper opportunity to the Judgment Debtor to produce the document. Therefore, after the dismissal of Sec.47 application in E.A.No.4 of 2025, the Executing Court has passed an order of delivery. Aggrieved over that, this Civil Revision Petition has been filed.

3.The learned counsel for revision petitioner would submit that already the decree was obtained exparte before the trial court by the decree holder. But, without giving fair opportunity, the Executing Court has proceeded with the __________ Page2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 2003 of 2026 matter and dismissed the application as such is erroneous one. Hence, he prayed to stay the proceedings in the Execution Petition.

4.The learned counsel for respondent raised objections stating that the suit for ejectment was filed in the year 2011 and all these years, he was dragged on with the proceedings, since his claim under Sec.47 of C.P.C. is not sustainable one and his ownership is also admitted. Therefore, the Executing Court has rightly dismissed the application filed in E.A.No.4 of 2025, which requires no interference.

5.As on date, challenging the order passed in E.A.No.4 of 2025, the 2 nd Judgment Debtor preferred this Civil Revision Petition. Admittedly, before the trial court, an exparte decree was obtained by the Decree Holder in O.S.No.3189 of 2011. So, by filing application under Sec.47 of C.P.C., the Judgment Debtor is entitled to raise his defence. If opportunity is not given to him, his right to defend the case will be defeated and in such circumstances, if the executing court initiated proceedings to execute the decree, it will lead to miscarriage of justice. Therefore, all further proceedings in E.P.No.3698 of 2022 on the file of X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, is ordered to be stayed.

6. Admit.

__________ Page3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 2003 of 2026

7.Issue notice to the respondent returnable by 11.06.2026. Private notice is also permitted.

8.Post the matter on 11.06.2026.

06-04-2026 RPP To The X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

__________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 2003 of 2026 T.V.THAMILSELVI J.

RPP CRP No. 2003 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 8912 OF 2026 06-04-2026 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis