Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Nirav Deepak Modi vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 31 July, 2025

Neeta Sawant                                 10-PIL-107-2009(CIVIL)& CONN..docx

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                  PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 107 OF 2009
                                    WITH
                        CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5 OF 2019
                                    WITH
                       CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 76 OF 2010
                                    WITH
                       CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2019


Sambhuraje Yuvakranti of Akhil
Bhartiya Maratha Seva Sangh                                     ....Petitioner

         : Versus :

Tahasildar -Alibaug & Ors.                                     .....Respondents


                                     Alongwith

                            WRIT PETITION NO. 2235 OF 2010

Jamshed Pesi Cama                                               ....Petitioner

         : Versus :

State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                    .....Respondents


                                     Alongwith

                            WRIT PETITION NO. 2541 OF 2010

Nirav Deepak Modi                                               ....Petitioner

         : Versus :

State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                    .....Respondents


_______________________________________________________________________
                                Page No.1 of 4
                             Thursday, 31 July 2025


      ::: Uploaded on - 31/07/2025                   ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2025 22:22:35 :::
 Neeta Sawant                                 10-PIL-107-2009(CIVIL)& CONN..docx


                                     Alongwith

                            WRIT PETITION NO. 2297 OF 2010

Karuna Abhijit Rajan                                            ....Petitioner

         : Versus :

The Sub-Divisional Officer & Ors.                              .....Respondents



_______________________________________________________________

Mr. Uday B. Nighot, for Petitioner in PIL/107/2009.

Mr. V. R. Dhond, Senior Advocate and Mr. Naushad Engineer, Senior
Advocate with Mr. Samar M. Jaidev, Mr. Sanjay Udeshi, Mr. Aditya
Udeshi, Mr. Netaji Gawde & Mr. Rahul Sanghvi i/b Sanjay Udeshi & Co.,
for Petitioner in WP/2235/2010

Mr. Jay Savla, Senior Advocate ( Through VC ) with Ms. Renuka
Sahu & Ms. Siddhi Chavan i/b M.P. Savla & Co., for Applicant in
CAI/4/2019

Mr. R.V. Govilkar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shaba N. Khan, Mr.
N.R. Prajapati & Mr. Sachidanand T. Singh, for Respondent No. 6 in
PIL/107/2009

Ms. Jaya Bagwe, for Respondent No. 7 - MCZMA in PIL/107/2009

Ms. Neha Bhide, for Applicant - Enforcement Directorate in
CA/5/2019

Mr. M.M. Pabale, AGP for State, Respondent in PIL/107/2009

Ms. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for State, Respondent in WP/2235/2010 &
WP/2541/2010.
_______________________________________________________________________
                                Page No.2 of 4
                             Thursday, 31 July 2025


      ::: Uploaded on - 31/07/2025                   ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2025 22:22:35 :::
 Neeta Sawant                                 10-PIL-107-2009(CIVIL)& CONN..docx


Ms. G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for State, Respondent in
WP/2297/2010.
______________________________________________________________


                                     CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, CJ

                                                SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATED : 31 July 2025.

P.C. :

1) In these petitions filed as Public Interest Litigations, issue relating to unauthorised construction in CRZ area in Alibaug Taluka, Raigad District has been raised. The Petitioners seek a direction to the Respondents to take an action of demolition of illegal construction.
2) The writ petition was filed by taking into account the CRZ Notification dated 19 February 1991 as amended in the year 1994.

Thereafter, during the pendency of Writ petitions, Notification dated 6 January 2011 has been issued which has been superseded by CRZ Notification dated 18 January 2019.

3) The impact and effect of the aforesaid Notifications on the construction in question is required to be considered. We therefore request Dr. Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate to assist us as learned Amicus Curiae. Office is directed to supply copy of the petitions alongwith all necessary documents to Dr. Sathe.

_______________________________________________________________________ Page No.3 of 4 Thursday, 31 July 2025 ::: Uploaded on - 31/07/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2025 22:22:35 ::: Neeta Sawant 10-PIL-107-2009(CIVIL)& CONN..docx

4) In the meanwhile, it would be open for the Respondents to file a compliance report, if so advised.

[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] _______________________________________________________________________ Page No.4 of 4 Thursday, 31 July 2025 ::: Uploaded on - 31/07/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2025 22:22:35 :::