Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Shivalik (Aambali) Co Op Housing ... vs State Of Gujarat & on 11 September, 2013

Author: Ravi R.Tripathi

Bench: Ravi R.Tripathi

  
	 
	 SHIVALIK (AAMBALI) CO OP HOUSING SOCIETY - THROUGH SECRETARY....Applicant(s)V/SSTATE OF GUJARAT
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	C/CA/8372/2013
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR
CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 8372 of 2013
 


 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

In
			MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP NUMBER) NO.  1698 of 2013
		
	
	 
		 
			 

In
			SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13965 of 2007
		
	

 


 


 

================================================================
 


SHIVALIK (AAMBALI) CO OP
HOUSING SOCIETY - THROUGH SECRETARY....Applicant(s)
 


Versus
 


STATE OF GUJARAT  & 
17....Respondent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MS
ARCHANA R ACHARYA, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
 

MR
HARSHEEL SHUKLA AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 8
 

MR
MEHUL SHARAD SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 3 - 7
 

MR
PARTHIV B SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 10 - 18
 

RULE
SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 2 , 9
 

================================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 11/09/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

1. Present Civil Application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 1770 days in filing Misc. Civil Application (for review).

2. Heard learned advocate, Ms.Archana Acharya, for the applicant.

3. Learned advocate invited the attention of the Court to the fact that the order which the applicant seeks to be considered for review is dated 11.8.2008. The said order was challenged by applicant in filing Letters Patent Appeal being No. 537 of 2010. In that Letters Patent Appeal, the request was made to permit the applicant to withdraw the Letters Patent Appeal with a view to file review application before the learned Single Judge. That permission was granted by the Division Bench and the Letters Patent Appeal was disposed of as withdrawn on 11.7.2013. The MCA (for review) is filed on 16.7.2013. Thus, the delay of 1770 days is technical delay. In fact after the Division Bench permitted the applicant to withdraw the Letters Patent Appeal on 11.7.2013, the Misc. Civil Application was filed at the earliest on 16.7.2013.

Rule was issued and made returnable on 23.8.2013.

Learned advocate Mr.Mehul Sharad Shah has filed his appearance for respondent Nos. 3 to 7, learned AGP, Mr.Harsheel Shukla, has filed his appearance for respondent Nos. 1 and 8 and Mr. Parthiv Shah has filed his appearance for respondent Nos. 10 to 18. Respondent Nos.2 and 9 though served but nobody appears.

For the contents of the application, the same is allowed. Delay is condoned. Rule made absolute.

7. On a request made by learned advocate,Ms.Archana Acharya, Registry is directed to notify MCA (St.) 1698 of 2013 for hearing tomorrow after giving pakka number.

(RAVI R.TRIPATHI, J.) ashish Page 3 of 3