Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

S.M. Matloob vs Indian Council Of Cultural Relations ... on 28 March, 2016

Bench: Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, S.A. Bobde

      SLP(C) No. 26404 of 2015


      ITEM NO.50                             COURT NO.6                       SECTION XIV

                                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F           I N D I A
                                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

      Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                   No.    26404/2015

      (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21/05/2015
      in WPC No. 5226/2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New
      Delhi)

      S.M. MATLOOB                                                                Petitioner(s)

                                                       VERSUS

      INDIAN COUNCIL OF CULTURAL
      RELATIONS (ICCR) THR. DIRECTOR GENERAL                                      Respondent(s)

      (With application for permission to appear and argue in person and
      application for permission to file written submission-cum-rejoinder
      office report)


      Date : 28/03/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

      CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE

      For Petitioner(s)
                                        in person


      For Respondent(s)
                                        Mr. R. C. Kaushik, A.O.R.


                            UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                                              O R D E R

Application seeking permission to appear and argue in person is allowed.

By the impugned order, the High Court has Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA directed the respondent to pay the petitioner the Date: 2016.03.29 14:52:36 IST Reason: amount admissible to him after granting him 50 per PAGE NO. 1 of 2 SLP(C) No. 26404 of 2015 cent of the back wages from the date of his transfer, Regional Office, Lucknow, till he joined back his duties in New Delhi. A period of one month was also fixed by the impugned order dated 31st May, 2015. Mr. Matloob, petitioner-in-person states that even that 50 per cent has not been paid to him so far. We, therefore, direct the respondent, at the first instance, to pay 50 per cent of the back wages as directed in the impugned order within a period of one month from today and to report to this Court on the next date of hearing.

List the matter on 2nd May, 2016 for compliance.

                  [KALYANI GUPTA]                                         [SHARDA KAPOOR]
                    COURT MASTER                                            COURT MASTER




PAGE NO. 2 of 2