Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 8]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Munawar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 February, 2021

Bench: Rohinton Fali Nariman, B.R. Gavai

                                                             1

                                                                                          OUT TODAY

     ITEM NO.27 + 36                     Court 3 (Video Conferencing)                 SECTION X

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                  Writ Petition(s)(Criminal)          No(s).   62/2021

     MUNAWAR                                                                      Petitioner(s)

                                                            VERSUS

     THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.                                           Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.13681/2021-STAY APPLICATION and IA
     No.13679/2021-GRANT OF BAIL and IA No.13684/2021-EXEMPTION FROM
     FILING AFFIDAVIT)

     with
     SLP (Crl.) No. 1045 of 2021
     (for admission and IR and exemption from filing c/c of the impugned
     Judgment and exemption from filing OT and exemption from filing
     affidavit)

     Date : 05-02-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

     For Petitioner(s)                       Mr.   Vikram Chaudhri, Sr. Adv.
                                             Mr.   Saurabh Kirpal, Adv.
                                             Mr.   Harshit Sethi, Adv.
                                             Mr.   Rishi Sehgal, Adv.
                                             Mr.   Rahil Mahajan, Adv.
                                             Mr.   Keshavam Chaudhri, Adv.
                                             Ms.   Ria Khanna, Adv.
                                             Ms.   Anzu. K. Varkey, AOR
     For Respondent(s)

                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

The learned counsel has pointed out to us that quite apart from the fact that the allegations made in the FIR are vague that Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2021.02.05 the procedure contained in Section 41 Cr.P.C. as adumbrated by our 16:36:34 IST Reason:

Judgment in “Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Anr.”, reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, has not been followed before arresting the 2 petitioner. This being the case, we issue notice in both the petitions, and stay the Judgment of the High Court. The petitioner is released on ad-interim bail on conditions to the satisfaction of the trial court.

In the meantime, there shall be stay of the production warrants as well.



(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA)                                   (NISHA TRIPATHI)
  COURT MASTER                                          BRANCH OFFICER