Madhya Pradesh High Court
Satendra Gupta vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 March, 2020
Author: Anand Pathak
Bench: Anand Pathak
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
1 M.Cr.C. No.9685/2020
Satendra Gupta Vs. State of M.P.
Gwalior Bench Dated: 13/3/2020
Shri Mehmood Khan, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Mukesh Sharma, learned PP for the respondent/State.
With consent heard finally.
The applicant has filed this first application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail, who has been arrested and is in custody since 9.2.2020 in connection with Crime No.330/2019 registered at Police Station, Bahodapur, District Gwalior, for the offence punishable under Sections 370, 372, 373, 376, 344, 34 of IPC, Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 3, 5 and 7 of the Immoral Trafficking Act.
It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that false case has been registered against him and he is suffering confinement since 9.2.2020. It is further submitted that applicant learnt the lesson hard way and would mend his ways. It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that only on the basis of memo under Section 27 of the Evidence Act and reference of his name allegedly in the statement of the prosecutrix, he has been implicated, whereas no role is attributable in specific terms of commission of offence of rape over present applicant. He does not bear any criminal record. He undertakes to cooperate in investigation/trial and would not make any default in appearance before the trial Court and would not be a source of THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 2 M.Cr.C. No.9685/2020 embarrassment/harassment to the complainant party in any manner. He also undertakes to perform community service.
Learned Public Prosecutor for the State opposed the prayer and prayed for dismissal of the application.
Considering the submissions advanced, looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court concerned.
This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-
1- vkosnd Loa; }kjk fu"ikfnr can i= dh leLr fuca/kuks ,oa 'krksZ dk vuqikyu djsxkA 2- vkosnd vUos"[email protected] esa izdj.k ,oa funsZ'kkuqlkj lg;ksx djsxkA 3- vkosnd ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr dks izyksHku] /kedh vFkok opu nsus esa Lo;a dks fyIr ugha djsxk] tks fd mls@mldks ,sls rF;ksa dks U;k;ky; ;k iqfyl vf/kdkjh ls izdVhdj.k djus ls izofjr djs] tSlh Hkh fLFkfr gks( 4- vkosnd ftl vijk/k ds fy, nks"kh gS ml izdkj dk lekUk vijk/k dkfjr ugha djsxk A 5- vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku vuko';d LFkxu dh ekWx ugh djsxkA 6- vkosnd fopkj.k U;k;ky;@vUos"k.k vf/kdkjh dh iwoZ vuqefr ds fcuk Hkkjr ugh NksMsxkA tSlh Hkh fLFkfr gks ,oa( 7- vkonsd vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vkjksi i= is'k gksus rd izR;sd lkseokj dks lqcg 10-30 ls nksigj 2 cts rd lcaf/kr iqfyl Fkkuk esa viuh mifLFkfr ntZ djok;sxk] ,oa THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 3 M.Cr.C. No.9685/2020 8- ,rn~ }kjk ;g funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd vkosnd 5 ikS/kks dk ¼ Qy nsus okys isM+ vFkok uhe@ihiy½ jksi.k djsxk rFkk mls vius vkl iMksl esa isM+ dh lqj{kk ds fy, ckM+ yxkus dh O;oLFkk djuh gksxh rkfd ikS/kk lqjf{kr jg ldsA vkosnd dk ;g drZO; gS fd u dsoy ikS/kksa dks yxk;k tk,s] cfYd mUgsa iks"k.k Hkh fn;k tk,A ^^o`{kkjksi.k ds lkFk] o`{kkiks"k.k Hkh vko';d gSA^^ vkosnd fo'ks"kr% 6&8 QhV ÅWaps ikS/ks@isM+ksa dks yxk;sxk rkfd os 'kh?kz gh iw.kZ fodflr gks ldsaA vuqikyu lqfuf'pr djus ds fy,] vkosnd dks fjgk fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls 30 fnuksa ds Hkhrj lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k o`{kksas@ikS/kksa ds jksi.k ds lHkh QksVks çLrqr djuk gksxsaA rRi'pkr~] fopkj.k ds lekiu rd gj rhu eghus esa vkosnd ds }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izxfr fjiksVZ çLrqr dh tk,xh A o`{kksa dh çxfr ij fuxjkuh j[kuk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk drZO; gS D;ksafd i;kZoj.k {kj.k ds dkj.k ekuo vfLrRo nkao ij gS vkSj U;k;ky; vuqikyu ds ckjs esa vkosnd }kjk fn[kkbZ xbZ fdlh Hkh ykijokgh dks utj vankt ugh dj ldrk gSA blfy, vkosnd dks isM+ksa dh çxfr vkSj vkosnd }kjk vuqikyu ds laca/k esa ,d fjiksVZ çLrqr djus ds fy, funZsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa vkonsd }kjk fd;s x;s vuqikyu dh ,d la{kfIr fjiskVZ bl U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rhu ekg esa ¼vxys N% eghuksa ds fy,½ j[kh tk;sxh ftls fd ^^funsZ'k ^^ 'kh"kZ ds varxZr j[kk tk,xkA o`{kkjksi.k esa ;k isM+ksa dh ns[kHkky esa vkosnd dh vksj ls dh xbZ dksbZ Hkh pwd vkosnd dks tekur dk ykHk ysus ls oafpr dj ldrh gSA vkosnd dks viuh ilan ds LFkku ij bu ikS/kksa@isMksa dks jksius dh Lora=rk gksxh] ;fn og bu jksis x;s isMksa dh Vªh xkMZ ;k ckM+ yxkdj j{kk djuk pkgrk gS] vU;Fkk vkosnd dks o`{kksa ds jksi.k ds fy, rFkk muds lqj{kk mik;ksa ds fy, vko';d [kpsZ ogu djuk gksxsaA bl U;k;ky; }kjk ;g funsZ'k ,d ijh{k.k izdj.k ds rkSj ij fn, x, gSa rkfd fgalk vkSj cqjkbZ ds fopkj dk izfrdkj] l`tu ,oa izd`fr ds lkFk ,dkdkj gksus ds ek/;e ls lkeaktL; LFkkfir fd;k tk ldsA orZeku esa ekuo vfLrRo ds vko';d vax ds :i esa n;k] lsok] izse ,oaa d:a.kk dh izd`fr dks fodflr djus dh vko';drk THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 4 M.Cr.C. No.9685/2020 gS D;ksafd ;g ekuo thou dh ewyHkwr izo`fr;ka gSa vkSj ekuo vfLrRo dks cuk, j[kus ds fy, budk iquthZfor gksuk vko';d gSA ^^;g iz;kl dsoy ,d o`{k ds jksi.k dk iz'u u gksdj cfYd ,d fopkj ds vadqj.k dk gSA^^ Certified copy as per rules.
(Anand Pathak) Judge ms/-
MADHU SOODAN PRASAD 2020.03.16 15:35:36 -07'00'