Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Kerala High Court

Mahish Kunnummal vs The State Of Kerala on 9 January, 1984

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

                THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

      TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017/9TH PHALGUNA, 1938

                     WP(C).No. 6654 of 2017 (F)
                     ---------------------------


PETITIONER(S):
-------------

           MAHISH KUNNUMMAL,
           S/O K.V. MADHAVAN AGRED 52 YEARS,
           CRAFT TEACHER, CHAMPAD WEST U.P. SCHOOL,
           CHOKI-670691, KANNUR DISTRICT.
           (RESIDEING AT KUNNAMMAL, CHAMPAD,
           KANNUR-670691).



            BY ADVS.SRI.T.T.MUHAMOOD
                    SRI.V.E.ABDUL GAFOOR
                    SRI.A.MOHAMMED SAVAD
                    SRI.C.Y.VINOD KUMAR
                    SRI.JAYENDRAN KOCHOTH

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

     1     THE STATE OF KERALA,
           REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
           GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,
           GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

     2     THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,
           JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014.

     3     THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
           KANNUR-670001.

     4     THE ASST. EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
           CHOKLI, KANNUR DISTRICT -670691.

     5     THE MANAGER,
           CHAMPAD WEST U.P. SCHOOL,
           CHOKLI670691, KANNUR DISTRICT.

             R1-4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. NISHA BOSE

      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION  ON
      28-02-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


EL

WP(C).No. 6654 of 2017 (F)
---------------------------

                             APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

P1   TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.3728/1984/G.EDN DATED 9.1.1984

P2   TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.2553/88/G.EDN DATED 12.07.1988

P3   TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.2102/89/G.EDN DATED 29.06.1989

P4   TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER  NO.A/KDIS/4854/89 DATED 18.08.1889
     ISSUE BY THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER CHOLKI

P5   TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25.01.1997 SUBMITTED BY
     THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT

P6   TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.2589/97/G.EDN DATED 28.07.1997

P7   TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 03.03.1998 SUBMITTED BY
     THE PETITIONER WHICH WAS PENDING  BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT

P8   TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.257/09/G.EDN DATED 31.12.2009

P9   TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.113/2000/G.EDN DATED 06.04.2000

P10  TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14.12.2016 FIED BY THE
     PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT


RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

           NIL


                                                TRUE COPY




                                              P.S. TO JUDGE
EL



                         P.V.ASHA, J.
           ---------------------------------------------
                W.P.(C). No.6654 of 2017
           ----------------------------------------------
           Dated this the 28th day of February, 2017



                          JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a Craft teacher whose appointment is approved with effect from 08.06.1981. According to the petitioner, he is at present working as part- time Craft teacher. Seeking full time benefit, he has approached the Government with Ext.P7 representation as early as in 1998. Thereafter, he has submitted Ext.P10 representation also pointing out that several teachers who were similarly situated, have already been given the benefit of full time with effect from the date of appointment itself, whereas he is denied the said benefit. Pointing out the orders and the instances where such benefits were granted, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied with a direction to the Government to pass orders on Ext.P10.

2. I heard the learned Government Pleader also. In view of the limited relief sought for, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Government, the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P10 within a W.P.(C). No.6654 of 2017 2 period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the 5th respondent.

Sd/-P.V.ASHA, Judge lsn