Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Leela vs Gobi Rajaraman on 15 January, 2025

Author: Jyoti Mulimani

Bench: Jyoti Mulimani

                                                   -1-
                                                              NC: 2025:KHC:1495
                                                          RFA No. 965 of 2023




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

                                              BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
                          REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 965 OF 2023 (INJ)
                      BETWEEN:

                      SMT. LEELA
                      W/O K.C.VASUDEVA,
                      AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
                      R/AT NO.1533/774,
                      ANNAIYAPPA LAYOUT,
                      KONENA AGRAHARA,
                      H.A.L.POST, BANGALORE-560 017.
                      REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER
                      SRI K.C.VASUDEVA,
                      S/O H.C.ANNAIAPPA,
                      AGED 71 YEARS,
                      R/AT NO.774/1533,
                      ANNAYAPPA LAYOUT,
                      KONENA AGRAHARA,
                      BANGALORE-560 017.
                                                                   ...APPELLANT
Digitally signed by   (BY SRI. K.G.SADASHIVAIAH., ADVOCATE)
PREMCHANDRA
MR
Location: High
                      AND:
Court of Karnataka
                      GOBI RAJARAMAN
                      S/O T.RAJARAMAN,
                      AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
                      NOW R/AT NO 54, 6TH CROSS,
                      MUNISWAMAPPA LAYOUT,
                      BDA LAYOUT, HAL 3RD STAGE,
                      VIMANAPURA POST,
                      BENGALURU-560 017.
                                                                 ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. DEEPAK.J., ADVOCATE)
                                  -2-
                                                NC: 2025:KHC:1495
                                             RFA No. 965 of 2023




        THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER
XLI RULE 1 READ WITH UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC,
1908.

        THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
                           ORAL ORDER

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, finally a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections' on 15.01.2025.

The appeal is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections'. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections.

Sd/-

(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9