Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

K. Gunasekaran vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 8 May, 2019

Bench: L. Nageswara Rao, M.R. Shah

     ITEM NO.33                             COURT NO.13                    SECTION II-C

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F        I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

              Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 4026/2019

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-02-2019
     in CRLOP No. 3078/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At
     Madras At Madurai)

     K. GUNASEKARAN                                                        Petitioner(s)

                                                    VERSUS

     THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU                                               Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.70823/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     O.T.)

     Date : 08-05-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH


     For Petitioner(s)                  Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AOR

     For Respondent(s)


                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.

Pending application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application for bail in the concerned Court after the charge Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by sheet is filed.

RACHNA

Date: 2019.05.09 17:35:05 IST Reason: 1 We make it clear that in case such an application for bail is filed, the concerned Court shall consider and dispose of it on its own merits and in accordance with law.

(POOJA CHOPRA)                              (KAILASH CHANDER)
 COURT MASTER                              ASSISTANT REGISTRAR




                              2