Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 16]

Madras High Court

Rm. Pm. Ranganathan Chettiar vs Chinna Lakshmi Achi on 16 December, 1954

Equivalent citations: AIR1955MAD546, AIR 1955 MADRAS 546, 1968 MADLW 156 ILR (1956) MAD 66, ILR (1956) MAD 66

ORDER

 

  Rajagopala Aiyangar, J.  

 

1. The question which arises here is whether a Court has power to compel a party to be examined by a doctor against her consent. Learned counsel for the petitioner admitted that there was no statutory provision on the matter. Apart from cases of lunacy - which stand on a special or peculiar footing, there is no decision placed before me in support of the position. Counsel invokes Section 151, Civil P. C., as enabling the Court to allow such an order. I do not at all agree that Section 151, Civil P. C. has any application to a case oE this sort. To pass such an order is in my opinion tantamount to treating a human being as a material object, which no Court should do under its inherent power. The Court might draw any adverse inference against a party who refuses to examine himself or herself. But I am unable to conceive of this Court having power to compel a medical test on a human being without his or her consent - apart from any statute which clothes the Court with such power. The petition fails and is dismissed. There will be no costs in this petition.