Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Shadab Ayub Khan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 10 August, 2021

Author: Sandeep K. Shinde

Bench: Sandeep K. Shinde

                                                     24-BA-2341-2021.odt


  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

            BAIL APPLICATION NO.2341 OF 2021
                          WITH
          INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1873 OF 2021

Shadab Ayub Khan                           ... Applicant
     Vs
The State of Maharashtra                ... Respondents
                                ...

Mr. Aabaad Ponda, Sr. Adv. i/by Karma Vivan for the
Applicant.

Mr. A.A.Palkar, APP for the Respondent-State.

Mr. Aditya Mithe for the Intervenor.

               CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.
               DATE :  10th AUGUST, 2021.


P.C. :

                Applicant seeks his enlargement on bail in

connection with the Crime No.684 of 2021 registered at

Sakinaka Police Station for the ofence punishable under

Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short).




Shivgan                                                                  1/6



 ::: Uploaded on - 11/08/2021          ::: Downloaded on - 12/08/2021 01:39:56 :::
                                                       24-BA-2341-2021.odt




2               Heard Mr. Ponda, the learned Senior Counsel for

the applicant, Mr. Palkar, the learned Additional Public

Prosecutor for the State and Mr. Mithe, the learned counsel

for the Intervenor.



3               Applicant is air-line pilot having eleven years

experience in aviation. He has no criminal antecedents.



4               Smt. Reshma Trenchil and the applicant were

residing in one building at Chandivali, Mumbai. On 21 st June,

2021, Smt. Reshma, 44 year old lady jumped from her 12 th

floor apartment with her son of 10 year old. Waatchman of

the apartment found the deceased and her son lying in pool

of blood. Following which, he alerted residents and the

police.



5               Following the incident, accident death enquiry

was held in ADR 70 of 2021. Wahereafter police constable


Shivgan                                                                   2/6



 ::: Uploaded on - 11/08/2021           ::: Downloaded on - 12/08/2021 01:39:56 :::
                                                      24-BA-2341-2021.odt

Kamble found suicide note left behind by the deceased

Reshma. In the suicide note, victim complained of harassing

her about her son making noise. Wahereafter the applicant

was arrested in the crime in question.



6               Mr. Ponda, the learned Senior Counsel for the

applicant, invited my attention to the complaints fled by

the applicant to the Manager of the Apartment and such

other complaints fled by his family, to the Senior Inspector

of Police to contend that the deceased was causing

continuous nuisance to residents since morning from 7-8

a.m. till 9-10 p.m. The complaints indicate that noise was

mainly of jumps or run, sliding tables and chairs. It appears,

after the complaints were fled, Senior Inspector of the

Police warned Reshma that she shall not cause anymore

nuisance to the residents of the apartment. The last

complaint was fled on 27th May, 2021. It appears, Reshma's

husband and her in-laws passed away in April/May, 2021 in

a pandemic of Covid-19. Submission is that the deceased


Shivgan                                                                  3/6



 ::: Uploaded on - 11/08/2021          ::: Downloaded on - 12/08/2021 01:39:56 :::
                                                    24-BA-2341-2021.odt

was depressed since her husband and in-laws expired in

April/May, 2021. Mr. Ponda, learned Senior Counsel for the

applicant would submit that the investigation in the case is

over and since trial is not likely to commence in near future,

applicant may be granted bail by imposing such conditions

to secure his presence for the trial. He submitted that

complaints fled by the applicant cannot be termed as,

'instigation', in-as-much as there is no material on record

to suggest that owing to the constant humiliation or ill-

treatment meted out to the deceased by the applicant,

deceased committed suicide. He would further submit that

ofending action ought to be proximate to the time of

occurrence, however, complaint to police has-had to

proximity to the incident. It is submitted that there is no

evidence capable of suggesting that the applicant by fling

complaints intended to instigate the deceased to commit

suicide. Mr. Ponda in support of his submission has relied on

the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Arnab

Goswami in Criminal Appeal No.742 of 2020.


Shivgan                                                                4/6



 ::: Uploaded on - 11/08/2021        ::: Downloaded on - 12/08/2021 01:39:56 :::
                                                         24-BA-2341-2021.odt




7               Be that as it may, herein, there is no material to

suggest that conduct of the applicant created such

circumstances which left deceased with no option but to

commit suicide. Prima-facie, accusations, do not constitute

ofence under Section 306 of the IPC.                  Even otherwise,

investigation is over and applicant's presence for the trial

can be secured by imposing conditions.



8               In consideration of the facts of the case and for

the reasons stated above, the application is allowed. Hence,

the following order:



                                ORDER

(i) The applicant in Crime No. 684 of 2021 registered with Sakinaka Police Station, shall be released on executing PR bond for the sum of Rs.30,000/- with one or more sureties in like sum.

Shivgan 5/6 ::: Uploaded on - 11/08/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 12/08/2021 01:39:56 :::

24-BA-2341-2021.odt

(ii) The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when called.

(iii) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case 9 The application and the Interim Application therein are accordingly disposed of. 10 It is made clear that observations made here-in- above be construed as expression of opinion for the purpose of bail only and the same shall not in any way influence the trial in other proceedings.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) Shivgan 6/6 ::: Uploaded on - 11/08/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 12/08/2021 01:39:56 :::