Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 9]

Gujarat High Court

Kantaben Wd/O Parthibhai Nagjibhai vs State Of Gujarat & 3 on 26 February, 2014

Author: M.D.Shah

Bench: M.D. Shah

        R/SCR.A/757/2011                                          ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

          SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 757 of 2011

================================================================
        KANTABEN WD/O PARTHIBHAI NAGJIBHAI....Applicant(s)
                           Versus
             STATE OF GUJARAT & 3....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR HIMANSU M PADHYA, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR BS KHATANA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 4
MR PR NANAVATI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 4
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2 - 3
MR LR PUJARI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================

        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.D. SHAH

                              Date : 26/02/2014


                               ORAL ORDER

This petition is filed praying to direct the respondent no.3 to lodge the complaint against respondent no.4 under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code.

Learned APP submits, on instructions, that as far as viscera report is concerned, no mark of presence is found and as per the P.M.report, cause of death is natural and due to sclerosis of liver.



             This          Court      has          gone     through         the

                                    Page 1 of 2
            R/SCR.A/757/2011                                            ORDER



P.M.report and found that no external mark of injury nor any injury is found in the P.M.report and prima facie, it seems that death is natural death. It is submitted by learned APP, on instructions, that necessary report will be submitted with the competent authority as per the law.

In view of the above, this petition is disposed of. It is clarified that if the petitioner has any grievance, then he is at liberty to take appropriate steps before the appropriate authority.

(M.D.SHAH, J.) Srilatha Page 2 of 2