Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Kreuz Subsea Pte Ltd vs Barge Sapura 2000(Mmsi No.533130084) on 17 February, 2021

Author: K.R.Shriram

Bench: K.R.Shriram

           Digitally signed                                  1/1                      13.COMASL-7284-2020.doc
           by Gauri A.
           Gaekwad
Gauri A.   Date:
Gaekwad    2021.02.18
           17:00:44
           +0530                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      ADMIRALTY AND VICE ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION
                                               IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
                                     COMMERCIAL ADMIRALTY SUIT (L) NO.7284 OF 2020
                                                       WITH
                                          JUDGES' ORDER (L) NO.7286 OF 2020
                                                         IN
                                     COMMERCIAL ADMIRALTY SUIT (L) NO.7284 OF 2020

                  Kreuz Subsea Pte. Ltd.                      ....Plaintiff
                              V/s.
                  Barge Sapura 2000
                  (MMSI No.533130084)                  ....Defendant
                                                      ----
                  Ms. Bulbul Singh-Rajpurohit i/b. M/s. Crawford Bayley and Co. for plaintiff.
                  Mr. Prathamesh Kamat a/w. Mr. Shailesh Poria, Ms. Rajashree Ram and Ms.
                  Aafreen Noor i/b. Economic Laws Practice for applicant in
                  IA/LD/VC/52A/2020.
                                                      ----
                                                       CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATED : 17th FEBRUARY 2021 P.C. :

1 Interim Application No.LD-VC-52A of 2020 be listed for hearing and final disposal on 3rd March 2021.
2 The warrant of arrest has not been served. The writ of summons has not been served but Mr. Kamat waives service of writ of summons.
3 Written statement to be filed and copy served on or before 30th April 2021. Ofcourse, Mr. Kamat states that if the Court holds that defendant no.1 could not have been arrested and vacates the order of arrest, the suit itself may have to be dismissed.

(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad