Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0] [Entire Act]

State of Maharashtra - Section

Section 19 in The Maharashtra District Planning Committee (Election) Rules, 1999

19. Scrutiny of nomination papers.

(1)On the date fixed for the scrutiny of nomination papers under rule 13, the candidates, their election agents, one proposer of each candidate and one other person duly authorised in writing by each candidate, may attend at the time and place appointed in this behalf under rule 13, and the Returning Officer shall give them reasonable facilities for examining the nomination papers of all candidates which have been delivered as required by rule 16.
(2)The Returning Officer shall then examine (he nomination papers and shall decide all the objections which may be received in respect of any nomination and may, either on such objection or on his own motion, after such summary inquiry, as he considers necessary, reject any nomination on any of the following grounds, that is to say -
(a)that the candidate is disqualified for being chosen to fill the seat by or under the Act;
(b)that the proposer is disqualified from subscribing a nomination paper;
(c)that there has been a failure to comply with any of the provisions of rule 16:
(d)that the signature of the candidate or the proposer on the nomination paper is not genuine.
(3)Nothing contained in clause (c) or (d) of sub-rule (2) shall be deemed to authorise the rejection of the nomination of any candidate on the ground of any irregularity in respect of a nomination paper, if the candidate has been duly nominated by means of another nomination paper in respect of which no irregularity has been committed.
(4)The Returning Officer shall not reject any nomination paper on the ground of any defect which is not of a substantial character.
(5)The Returning Officer shall hold the scrutiny on the date appointed in this behalf under rule 13 and shall not allow any adjournment of the proceedings, except when such proceedings are interrupted or obstructed for reasons beyond his control :Provided that, in case any objection is raised by the Returning Officer or is made by any other person, the candidate concerned may be allowed time to rebut it not later than the next day, and the Returning Officer shall record his decision on the date on which the proceedings have been adjourned.
(6)The Returning Officer shall endorse on each nomination paper his decision accepting or rejecting the same and if the nomination paper is rejected, shall record in writing a brief statement of his reasons for such rejection in Form II-B.
(7)For the purposes of this rule, the production of a certified copy of an entry made in the voters' list of the relevant constituency shall be conclusive evidence of the right of any voter named in that entry to contest election, unless it is proved that the candidate is disqualified.