Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Indus Valley Homes Pvt Ltd vs Sobha Carnation Apartment Owners ... on 7 April, 2025

Author: H.T. Narendra Prasad

Bench: H.T. Narendra Prasad

                                                 -1-
                                                               NC: 2025:KHC:14769
                                                              WP No. 7130 of 2023




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025

                                               BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
                              WRIT PETITION NO. 7130 OF 2023 (GM-CPC)
                      BETWEEN:

                      M/S INDUS VALLEY HOMES PVT. LTD
                      A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY
                      INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS
                      OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1956
                      HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
                      AT NO.6/A, 2ND FLOOR, "KOBRA EXCELSIOR"
                      7TH MAIN, 1ST BLOCK, KORAMANGALA
                      BENGALURU-560034
                      REP BY ITS PARTNER
                      SRI NARESH DANDAPATH.
                                                                     ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. SANJAY KRISHNA V., ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    SOBHA CARNATION APARTMENT
Digitally signed by         OWNERS ASSOCIATION
HEMALATHA A                 AT SOBHA CARNATION APARTMENT
Location: HIGH              COMPLEX, SURVEY NO.100/7, 98/2A
COURTOF
KARNATAKA                   98/2B, AND 98/1 (PART)
                            BELLANDUR VILLAGE
                            BENGALURU-560103
                            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

                      2.    SOBHA INNERCITY TECHNOPOLIS PRIVATE LIMITED
                            A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
                            THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT
                            HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
                            AT NO.E-106, "SUNRISE CHAMBERS"
                            ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU-560042
                            REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
                              -2-
                                         NC: 2025:KHC:14769
                                       WP No. 7130 of 2023




3.   SOBHA DEVELOPERS LIMITED
     A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER
     THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT
     HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
     AT SOBHA SARJAPUR MARATHHALLI
     OUTER RING ROAD, DEVARABISANAHALLI
     BELLANDUR POST, BENGALURU-560103
     REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

4.  THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
    SANKEY ROAD, NEAR 5TH MAIN ROAD
    KUMARAPARK WEST GUTTAHALLI
    BENGALURU-560020
    REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KASHYAP N NAIK., ADVOCATE FOR R1:
SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3:
SRI. SRINIVAS BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 17.01.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-G
PASSED BY THE LEARNED XXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-38) IN O.S.NO.3061/2013 BENGALURU
ON THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF UNDER ORDER
I RULE 8 (A) CPC AND ETC.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:      HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD


                        ORAL ORDER

This writ petition is filed by defendant No.4 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 17.01.2023 passed on IA in O.S.No.3061/2013 by the XXXVII Additional City Civil and -3- NC: 2025:KHC:14769 WP No. 7130 of 2023 Sessions Judge, Bengaluru whereby the application filed by the plaintiff under Order 1 Rule 8 of CPC has been rejected.

2. The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration and injunction. On service of summons, defendants appeared through counsel and filed the written statement. The petitioner/defendant No.4 also taken a contention that the suit is not maintainable since the plaintiff has not complied the provisions of Order 1 Rule 8(a) of CPC. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the additional issue No.2 has been framed. The same is extracted below:

"Whether the defendant No.4 prove that the suit is liable to be dismissed as the plaintiff has not complied the provisions of Order 1 Rule 8(a) of CPC?"

3. The only grievance of the petitioner/defendant No.4 is that the application filed by the plaintiff under Order 1 Rule 8 of CPC has been rejected and it will not come in the way of deciding additional issue No.2. The -4- NC: 2025:KHC:14769 WP No. 7130 of 2023 additional issue No.2 is a burden on defendant No.4 to prove.

4. The application filed by the plaintiff under Order 1 Rule 8 has been rejected and it has not been challenged by the plaintiff. The rejection of the application will not come in the way of the court to decide issue No.2 in accordance with law.

5. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

In view of disposal of the petition, all pending applications stand disposed of.

Sd/-

(H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 48