Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

National Health And Education Society- ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Sales Tax ... on 4 August, 2022

Author: K.R. Shriram

Bench: K.R. Shriram

          Digitally
          signed by
          MUGDHA
MUGDHA    M
M         PARANJAPE
PARANJAPE Date:
          2022.08.05                           1                    3-WPL 18600-22.doc
          10:18:04
          +0530


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                               WRIT PETITION (L) NO.18600 OF 2022

              National Heath and Education Society-
              P.D. Hinduja National Hospital and
              Medical Research Centre                                ... Petitioner
                     Vs.
              Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax
              (MUM-VAT-E-905) Appeals Nodal Division-5
              & Anr.                                                 ... Respondents
                                                 -------
              Mr.D.B. Shroff, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Kazan Shroff and Mr. Aakash
              Chandran i/by Dastur Kalambi & Associates for Petitioner.
              Ms. Jyoti Chavan, AGP for Respondent-State.
                                                 -------

                                       CORAM       :     K.R. SHRIRAM &
                                                         A.S. DOCTOR, JJ.
                                       DATED       :     04th AUGUST 2022
              P.C. :

1. Petitioner is impugning an order dated 30 th March, 2022 passed by Respondent No.1 rejecting Petitioner's Appeal.

2. In the impugned order, Respondent No.1 has, in almost 20 pages, dealt with the submissions of Petitioner, but in the discussion has not given any reasons for his conclusions. Therefore, we have no hesitation in setting aside the order impugned in the Petition, i.e., order dated 30th March, 2022 and remand the matter back for reconsideration.

                 Mugdha                                                              1 of 3
                                      2                      3-WPL 18600-22.doc




3. The order is accordingly set aside with the following directions :-

(a) Respondent No.1 shall pass a fresh order dealing with every submission of Petitioner filed in the reply and and to be made during the personal hearing, notice for which shall be given at least seven working days in advance.
(b) In defence, should Petitioner wish to file written submissions regarding what transpired during the personal hearing, the same to be filed within three working days after the date of personal hearing.
(c) The order shall be a reasoned order and shall deal with every submission made by Petitioner and shall also give reasons as to why the officer has not agreed with Petitioner's submissions.
(d) The Appeal shall be disposed within twelve weeks from the date of uploading of this order.
 Mugdha                                                                      2 of 3
                                 3                     3-WPL 18600-22.doc


4. Writ Petition disposed with no order as to costs.
5. We clarify that we have not made any observations on merits.

(A.S. DOCTOR, J.) ( K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Mugdha 3 of 3