Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Basic Design And Solutions vs Sai Kripa Fitness on 28 January, 2022

Author: G.S.Kulkarni

Bench: G.S.Kulkarni

         Digitally signed
         by VIDYA
VIDYA    SURESH AMIN
SURESH   Date:
         2022.01.29
AMIN     17:27:30
         +0530




                                                                                        22 & 23.ARBPL186_2022.doc

                            Vidya Amin

                                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                    ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                                   ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 186 OF 2022

                                     Basic Design and Solutions                           ... Petitioner
                                           V/s.
                                     Sai Ram Fitness                                      ... Respondent

                                                                   AND
                                                  ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 201 OF 2022

                                     Basic Design and Solutions                           ... Petitioner
                                           V/s.
                                     Sai Krupa Fitness                                    ... Respondent

                                     Mr. Niranjan Mogre i/b. Siddhesh S. Borkar for the petitioner.
                                     Mr. Abhitanshu Khare for the respondents.

                                                               CORAM : G.S.KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 28 January, 2022 P.C.:

1. The respondents are represented by Mr. Khare, who prays for time to file reply affidavit. Let reply affidavit be filed within 10 days from today and copy of the same be served on the petitioner.

Rejoinder, if any be placed on record on or before the returnable date.

2. Stand over to 11 February, 2022.

3. All the details of the advocate for the respondents be placed on record as also to be furnished to the advocate for the petitioner and Vakalatnama be filed before the returnable date. 1/2

22 & 23.ARBPL186_2022.doc

4. As now the respondent is represented by its Advocate, it is deemed that the service of the proceedings on the respondent is complete.

(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) 2/2