Kerala High Court
Sreekumar.M.K vs Ramadasan
Author: V.K.Mohanan
Bench: P.N.Ravindran, Devan Ramachandran, V.K.Mohanan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/29TH JYAISHTA, 1939
RFA.No. 530 of 2007 ( )
------------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 117/2005 of SUB COURT, TIRUR
----------
APPELLANT:
---------
SREEKUMAR.M.K., S/O.M.NARAYANAN NAIR,'SAISREE'
THENHIPALAM, TIRURANGADI.
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.JYOTHI PRASAD
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. RAMADASAN, THENHIPALAM,AMSOM, DESOM,
CHENGOTT KOTTEKKAT, THIRURANGADI.
2. VELAYUDHAN, THENHIPALAM,AMSOM, DESOM,
CHENGOTT KOTTAKKAT , THIRURANGADI.
BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 19-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
K.V.
RFA.No. 530 of 2007 ( )
----------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES:
---------------------
A1; CERTIFIED COPY OF DECREE IN OS NO 311/08 DATED 27/10/11 OF THE
FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT PARAPPANANADI.
A2; CERTIFIED COPY OF COMMISSION REPORT AND SKETCH DATED 5/1/09 IN
OS NO 311/08 OF THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT PARAPPANANGADI.
A3; CERTIFIED COPY COMMISSION REPORT AND SKETCH DATED 11/6/09 IN
OS NO 311/08 OF THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT PARAPPANANGADI.
A4; CERTIFIED COPY OF COMMISSION REPORT AND SKETCH DATED 12.10.09
IN OS NO 311/08 OF THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT PARAPPANANGADI.
A5: CERTIFIED COPY OF COMMISSION REPORT AND SKETCH DATED 4.7.11 IN
OS NO 311/08 OF THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT PARAPPANANGADI.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL
-----------------------
/TRUE COPY/
P.S.TO JUDGE
K.V.
P.R.RAMAN & V.K.MOHANAN,JJ
----------------------------------------------
I.A.3935 OF 2007
R.F.A.NO.530 OF 2007
----------------------------------------------
Dated, 29th October 2007.
order
When this petition came up for extension of interim order, a
counter affidavit is seen filed by the Ist respondent wherein it is
stated that the respondents have no intention to alienate the
property in question. Hence the respondents will not be
prejudicially affected by the order of injunction. The interim order
is extended until further orders. However, in case occasion arises
to sell the property, it is open to the respondents to move this Court
for appropriate modification in the order.
P.R.Raman, Judge.
V.K.Mohanan, Judge.
kvm/-
Hand over the order
CR 2
V.K.MOHANAN, J.
No....
Judgment/Order Dated: