Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Patna High Court - Orders

Bihar State Goshala Pinjarapol vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 30 August, 2013

Author: Navin Sinha

Bench: Navin Sinha, Vikash Jain

        Patna High Court MJC No.844 of 2007 (2) dt.30-08-2013




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.844 of 2007
                     ======================================================
                     Bihar State Goshala Pinjarapol               .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                     State Of Bihar & Ors                     .... .... Respondent/s
                     ======================================================
                     Appearance :
                     For the Petitioner/s    : Mr. Rajni Kant Jha
                     For the Respondent/s     : Mr. (Aag1)
                                                 Mr. Chandra Mohan Singh
                                                 Mr. Prakash Mahto
                     ======================================================
                     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
                                and
                                HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
                     ORAL ORDER
                     (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA)

2    30-08-2013

This matter has been listed under the heading Orders (Office Notes) with the defect that second copy of the show cause filed on behalf of Opposite party no. 3 is not on record.

We considered it proper to peruse the record. The direction in the writ petition was only to dispose the representation.

The single copy of the show cause filed on behalf of Opposite party no. 3 states that after hearing the petitioner, Opposite party no. 3 has disposed the representation by speaking order dated 26.6.2007 communicated to all the concerned authorities including the petitioner on 27.6.2007.

We are not inclined to keep this mater pending as a statistic for procedural and technical compliance when substantially nothing survives for adjudication in the contempt application which has become infructuous after compliance.

The MJC application is disposed as infructuous.




                                                     (Navin Sinha, J)


Snkumar/-                                            (Vikash Jain, J)