Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Schindler India Pvt. Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Another on 27 February, 2024

Author: Mahabir Singh Sindhu

Bench: Mahabir Singh Sindhu

                                                           Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:027501



CRM M-18063-2020                                 Neutral Citation No.2024:PHHC:027501


101(23)
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
                           CHANDIGARH

                                          CRM M-18063-2020 (O&M)
                                          Date of Decision: 27.02.2024

Schindler India Private Limited                               .......Petitioner

                                  Versus

State of Haryana and others                                   ........Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present: Mr. R.S. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, AAG, Haryana.

assisted by ASI Narender Singh.

Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU. J.

Present petition has been filed, under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "Cr.P.C"), seeking quashing of summons dated 06.08.2019 & 24.01.2020 (P-2) issued under Sections 91 & 160 Cr.P.C to petitioner in FIR No.222 dated 30.03.2018 registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC (Sections 467, 468, 471, 201 read with Section 120-B IPC added later on), at Police Station Sadar, District Palwal.

2. Learned State counsel after going through the averments made in para 12 of status report dated 12.09.2023, filed by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Palwal, (in CRM-M-17801-2018) and upon instructions from the police officer present, submits that an amount of Rs.1,76,78,265/- has already been refunded to Salasar Trading company; therefore, at this stage, they do not want to proceed against the petitioner in terms of notices dated 06.08.2019 & 24.01.2020.

1

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 09-03-2024 05:13:15 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:027501 CRM M-18063-2020 Neutral Citation No.2024:PHHC:027501

3. In view of the above, learned Senior counsel, on instructions, does not press the petition.

4. Ordered accordingly.

5. However, it is made clear that in case an occasion so arises, petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to the remedy available under law.

6. Pending criminal misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off.



27.02.2024                                       (MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU)
SN                                                      JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:027501 2 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 09-03-2024 05:13:15 :::