Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Madhu Bhushan vs State Of Punjab on 14 September, 2010

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB,
          S.C.O. NO.3009-10, SECTOR 22-D, CHANDIGARH.

                      Execution Application No.6 of 2009
                                      In
                      Consumer Complaint No.25 of 2008

                                                Date of Institution : 06.05.2009
                                                Date of decision : 14.09.2010

Madhu Bhushan s/o Harbans Lal R/o 105 I Bhai Randhir Singh Nagar, Ludhiana,
through attorney Smt. Chanda Jain w/o Sh.A.K.Jain r/o H.No.100 Mayur Vihar
Hambra Road Ludhiana.
                                                                ...Decree holder

                                      Versus

1.

State of Punjab, through its Principal Secretary, Local Government, Punjab, Chandigarh.

2. Ludhiana Improvement Trust, Ludhiana, through its Chairman.

3. Sh.Gurdev Singh Ghuman, Administrator Ludhiana Improvement Trust, Ludhiana.

4. Sh.D.S.Bains, IAS Principal Secretary Deppt. of Local Government Punjab at Chandigarh.

...Judgment debtors Application under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Before:-

Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.N.Aggarwal, President.
Lt.Col.Darshan Singh (Retd.), Member. Mrs.Amarpreet Sharma, Member.
Present:-
For the decree holder : Sh.Parveen Kumar, Advocate for Sh.S.S.Salar, Advocate.
For judgment debtor No.1 : None. For judgment debtors No.2&3 : Sh.B.J.Singh, Advocate for Sh.D.P.Gupta, Advocate.
For judgment debtor No.4 : Sh.Sandeep Khunger, Advocate with Ms.Amarinder Kaur, Advocate.
JUSTICE S.N. AGGARWAL, PRESIDENT Learned counsel for the decree holder submitted that the stay order passed by the Hon'ble National Commission against the order passed by this Court is still in force. In these circumstances, this execution application is dismissed as not maintainable at this stage.
Dismissed.
Execution Application No.6 of 2009 2
However, the decree holder would be at liberty to file fresh execution application depending upon order passed by the Hon'ble National Commission.
(Justice S.N.Aggarwal) President (Lt.Col.Darshan Singh[Ret.]) Member (Mrs.Amarpreet Sharma) Member September 14, 2010.
Davinder