Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Nisar R vs State Of Kerala on 3 December, 2018

Author: K.Abraham Mathew

Bench: K.Abraham Mathew

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                 PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW

    MONDAY ,THE 03RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940

                         Crl.MC.No. 8213 of 2018

    AGAINST THE ORDER IN CC 567/2016 of J.M.F.C.-I, PERINTHALMANNA

          CRIME NO. 323/2016 OF Perinthalmanna Police Station ,
                                Malappuram

PETITIONERS:

      1        NISAR R.
               AGED 41 YEARS,S/O. RASHID,THECHIKATTIL HOUSE,
               THEKKINKODE J.N. ROAD, PERINTHALMANNA , MALAPPURAM
               679 321

      2        ABDUL AZEEZ @ PAPPANU,
               AGED 32 YEARS,S/O. SYED ALI,
               KAITHKOTTU VALAPPIL HOUSE,
               J. N. ROAD,
               PERITHALMANNA , MALAPPURAM 679 321

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.RAHUL SASI
               SMT.NEETHU PREM


RESPONDENTS:
       1     STATE OF KERALA
             REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
             HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031

      2        NISAR.T,AGED 38 YEARS
               S/O. MUHAMMED , THATTALTHODI HOUSE,
               PONNUMKURUSSI, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM 679 321

               BY ADV. SRI.T.M.BINOY

               SRI ALEX M THOMBRA-SR PP


THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION               ON
03.12.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Crl.MC.No. 8213 of 2018                       2

                                         ORDER

Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioners are the accused in C.C No.567 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Perinthalmanna. They are alleged to have committed the offences under Sections 427 and 447 IPC. The second respondent is the victim. It is submitted that the matter has been settled. The proceedings in the trial court are sought to be quashed.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the second respondent and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. I have perused the affidavit filed by the second respondent, who has entered appearance through counsel. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer of the petitioners.

In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The proceedings in C.C No.567 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Crl.MC.No. 8213 of 2018 3 Perinthalmanna are quashed. If any material objects have been produced in this case, the trial court may pass appropriate orders for their disposal.

Sd/-

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE pm APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 323 OF 2016 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION ANNEXURE A2 AFFIDAVIT DATED 30.11.2018 SUBSTITUTED BY 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE