Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Govindaraju M vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2026

Author: R Devdas

Bench: R Devdas

                                           -1-
                                                       NC: 2026:KHC:17468
                                                      WP No. 8553 of 2026


                 HC-KAR




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                      DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

                                        BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
                      WRIT PETITION NO. 8553 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)
                BETWEEN:

                      SRI GOVINDARAJU M
                      S/O LATE MARAIAH,
                      AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
                      R/O GANDRAGOLIPURA VILLAGE,
                      MADHURE HOBLI,
                      DODDABALLAPURA TALUK,
                      BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561 204.
                                                             ...PETITIONER
                (BY SRI. RAMESH K R., ADVOCATE)
                AND:

                1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
                      REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
Digitally signed      M.S. BUILDINGS,
by JUANITA            BENGALURU-560 001.
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF         2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KARNATAKA             BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
                      DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,
                      BEERASANDRA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK
                      BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110.

                3.    THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
                      DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION
                      DODDABALLAPURA
                      BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561 203.
                                   -2-
                                                NC: 2026:KHC:17468
                                              WP No. 8553 of 2026


HC-KAR



4.    THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
      BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT,
      DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,
      BEERASANDRA, DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
      BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110.

5.    THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
      OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR,
      DODDABALLAPURA TALUK,
      DODDABALLAPURA,
      BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561 203.

6.    THE TAHSILDAR
      DODDABALLAPURA TALUK,
      DODDABALLAPURA,
      BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561 203.
                                                   ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B P RADHA., AGA)


       THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NO.3 TO 6 TO MAKE PHODI
DURASTH OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.73/2 TO AN EXTENT
OF 3 ACRES 18 GUNTAS OF GANDRAGOLIPURA VILLAGE,
MADURE        HOBLI,   DODDABALLAPURA         TALUK,    BENGALURU
RURAL DISTRICT AS PER THE PANCHAYATH PALUPARIKATH
DATED     10.05.1990 AT ANNEXURE-A FOR 1 ACRE 28 1/2
GUNTAS INFAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER, AS REQUESTED BY
THE    PETITIONER      IN   THE    TATKAL     PHODI    APPLICATION
BEARING       NO.21020724284650         DATED      21.07.2024   AT
ANNEXURE-F, WITHIN A TIME FRAME.

       THIS     PETITION,   COMING       ON     FOR    PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                               -3-
                                           NC: 2026:KHC:17468
                                        WP No. 8553 of 2026


HC-KAR




CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS


                       ORAL ORDER

Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is directed towards Annexure-J, the impugned order passed by the respondent No.5 - Assistant Director of Land Records, Doddaballapura Taluk. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the owner of 1 acre 28.08 guntas of land in Survey No.73/2 of Gandragolipura Village, Madure Hobli, Doddaballapura Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District and the petitioner's brother is also the owner of another extent of 1 acre 28.08 guntas of land in Survey No.73/3. The petitioner has sought for Tatkal phodi in terms of Annexure-F dated 21.07.2024. However, the Assistant Director of Land Records, has passed the impugned order declining to conduct the phodi on the ground that in O.S. No.429/2024 on the file of the learned -4- NC: 2026:KHC:17468 WP No. 8553 of 2026 HC-KAR Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.), Doddaballapura, an order has been passed to maintain status quo and therefore the ADLR is not in a position to do the phodi.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner however draws the attention of this Court to a circular dated 20.04.2018 at Annexure-K issued by the revenue department where at paragraph No.5 specific directions have been given to the Survey Settlement Authorities not to reject the applications for phodi on the ground that a suit or other proceedings are pending before a civil court. It is clearly stated that unless there is a specific order directing the Survey Settlement Authorities or the Revenue Authorities not to conduct the phodi, the competent authority is required to proceed to conduct the phodi. Learned counsel submits that the injunction granted by the trial court is in the suit filed by the petitioner, where directions are issued to the parties to maintain status quo in respect of the possession of the property and -5- NC: 2026:KHC:17468 WP No. 8553 of 2026 HC-KAR that does not mean that the phodi or survey proceedings cannot be conducted.

4. Having regard to the facts narrated herein above, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the 5th respondent - Assistant Director of Land Records, Doddaballapura Taluk, to proceed to issue notice to all concerned and thereafter conduct the phodi in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.

Sd/-

(R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32