Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

State Of Rajasthan vs Satish Kumar Gehlot . on 16 May, 2016

Bench: Abhay Manohar Sapre, Ashok Bhushan

                                                    1

     ITEM NO.21                            COURT NO.2                  SECTION XV

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                Nos.13680-13682/2016

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28/04/2016
     in DBCWP No. 1427/2016 28/03/2016 in DBCWP No. 1427/2016 16/03/2016
     in DBCWP No. 1427/2016 passed by the High Court of Rajasthan at
     Jodhpur)

     STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS                                         Petitioner(s)

                                                  VERSUS

     SATISH KUMAR GEHLOT AND ORS.                                       Respondent(s)

     (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c                       of   the   impugned
     judgment and interim relief and office report)

     Date : 16/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
                                          (VACATION BENCH)

     For Petitioner(s)             Mr.    Tushar Mehra, Sr. Adv.
                                   Mr.    Shiv Mangal Sharma, AAG
                                   Mr.    Nishit Agrawal, Adv.
                                   Mr.    Shrey Kapoor, Adv.
                                   Mr.    Rohit K. Singh, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)


                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

Having heard Mr. Tushar Mehta, learned Additional Solicitor General for the petitioners, we are of the view that proper course open for the petitioners in this case is to seek review of the impugned order before the High Court rather than to Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by RASHMI DHYANI Date: 2016.05.17 pursue these special leave petitions, at this stage. 16:12:10 IST Reason:

We, accordingly, grant the petitioners liberty to file review petition(s) on the grounds on which these special leave 2 petitions are filed.
Petitioners would also be at liberty to bring to the notice the statement shown to us.
During the pendency of the review petition, it may not be necessary for Additional Chief Secretary (Higher & Technical Education)/Chief Secretary, Government of Rajasthan to appear in person as directed in the impugned order before the High Court.
However, liberty is granted to petitioners to move this Court in the event any adverse order passed in the matter.
The special leave petitions are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
     (SWETA DHYANI)                                     (RAJINDER KAUR)
       SR.P.A.                                           COURT MASTER