Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Devendra Yadav @ Devendra Prasad Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 4 July, 2017

Author: Vinod Kumar Sinha

Bench: Vinod Kumar Sinha

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Criminal Miscellaneous No.17057 of 2017
                      Arising Out of PS.Case No. -134 Year- 2015 Thana -LAUKHI District- MADHUBANI
                 ======================================================
                 1. Devendra Yadav @ Devendra Prasad Yadav, Son of Shri Bauku Yadav,
                 Resident of Village- Bishanpur, P.S.- Phulparas, District- Madhubani.

                                                                               .... ....   Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 1. The State of Bihar.

                                                                 .... .... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :  Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav
                 For the Opposite Party/s   : Mr. Rajballabh Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA
                 ORAL ORDER

4   04-07-2017

Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Laukahi P.S.Case No.134 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is allegation that the petitioner along with others is caused death of the deceased.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that whatever motive is there, that is against the co-accused, Rasik Lal. Apart from that there is no eye witness of the occurrence to show that the petitioner along with others has killed the deceased and only on the basis of village rivalry, he has been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 10.9.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail and drawn my attention towards para 12, 20, 27 and 90 of the Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17057 of 2017 (4) dt.04-07-2017 2/2 case diary, however, from perusal of the F.I.R. as well as aforesaid paragraph, it appears that no one is eye witness of the occurrence and the motive is against the co-accused.

Having heard both sides and considering above facts, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Laukahi P.S.Case No.134 of 2015 dated 1.8.2015.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/-

U