Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

R.Purushothaman vs The Assistant Registrar Of ... on 1 March, 2010

Author: K.Surendra Mohan

Bench: K.Surendra Mohan

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 6376 of 2010(V)


1. R.PURUSHOTHAMAN, VADAKKETHARAYIL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES

3. THE VALAMAGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.J.OM PRAKASH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN

 Dated :01/03/2010

 O R D E R
                         K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J.
               ------------------------------------------------------------
                        W.P(C) NO:6376 OF 2010
                -----------------------------------------------------------
                   Dated this the 1st March, 2010.

                                    JUDGMENT

The petitioner retired as Secretary of the third respondent society on 30.4.2005. As per pay revision effected by the Government for the employees of the Co-operative sector on 23.8.2005 with effect from 1.4.2004 the salary of employees have been substantially revised. The petitioner complains that the pay revision has not been implemented so far. The petitioner having retired only on 30.4.2005 claims that he is entitled to receive arrears of pay and other benefits consequent to the revision of pay that has been granted. The pensionary benefits of the petitioner would also have to be recomputed and refixed on the basis of the said revision. Though he had been requesting the third respondent for action in this regard, no action has been taken till date. He therefore prays for appropriate directions for an early decision on his request.

2. In the above circumstances this writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner evidenced herein by Ext.P2 in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders thereon as expeditiously as possible and at WPC 6376/2010 2 any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Pursuant to the said decision, the arrears of pay and other benefits due to the petitioner shall also be disbursed without further delay.





                                          K. SURENDRA MOHAN
                                                   Judge
jj

WPC 6376/2010    3

                      K.K.DENESAN & V. RAMKUMAR, JJ.

----------------------------------------------------

M.F.A.NO:

-----------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT Dated: