Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 15]

Bombay High Court

Navkar Builder And Developers And Ors vs Malini Krishnavallabh Singbal on 20 March, 2019

Author: K. K. Tated

Bench: K.K. Tated

                                                         (903) AOST 26427-18

Amk
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                 APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 26427 OF 2018
                                     WITH
                  CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 26428 OF 2018
                                       IN
                 APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 26427 OF 2018
                                     WITH
                 APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 26430 OF 2018
                                     WITH
                  CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 26431 OF 2018
                                       IN
                 APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 26430 OF 2018
                                     WITH
                 APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP)NO. 26432 OF 2018
                                     WITH
                  CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 26433 OF 2018
                                       IN
                 APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 26432 OF 2018
                                     WITH
                 APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 26438 OF 2018
                                     WITH
                  CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 26440 OF 2018
                                       IN
                 APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 26438 OF 2018
                                     WITH
                 APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 26443 OF 2018
                                     WITH
                  CIVIL APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 26444 OF 2018
                                       IN
                 APPEAL FROM ORDER (STAMP) NO. 26443 OF 2018



      Office    Notes,    Office        Court's or Judge's orders
      Memoranda of Coram,
      Appearances,       court's
      orders or directions and
      Registrar's orders



      Mr. Manoj P. Mhatre for the Appellant.
      Mr. Vishal Dhaka a/w. Mr. Shaunak Mishra i/b Solicis Lep for the
      Respondent.


                                                                                       1/3



         ::: Uploaded on - 22/03/2019               ::: Downloaded on - 22/03/2019 22:44:28 :::
                                                          (903) AOST 26427-18


                                         CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATE : 20th MARCH, 2019.

P. C. :

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. By these Appeals from Order, the Appellants are challenging the order dated 21.08.2018 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Mumbai directing them to make payment of compensation as per agreement for providing alternate accommodation dated 21.10.2014 and particularly Clause 5(a) which reads thus:
"5(a) The Developer agrees to pay the non-refundable monthly compensation of Rs.55/- (Rupees Fifty Five only) per square feet of carpet area of the Existing Premises as and by way of compensation for displacement of the Tenant/s for the first 12 months and thereafter 10% increase thereon for each successive year to the Tenant/s till the new premises are handed over to the Tenant/s with Occupation Certificate from M.C.G.M. and in consonance with the terms and conditions of these presents and as provided herein. The developers shall pay the said compensation for the displacement to the Tenant/s by one cheque for 12 months advance rent. The said monthly compensation for the first time shall begin from the day the Tenant/s has handed over the vacant and peaceful physical possession of the exciting Premise to the Developers for demolition."

3. When Court decline to entertain the Appeals from 2/3 ::: Uploaded on - 22/03/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 22/03/2019 22:44:28 ::: (903) AOST 26427-18 Order, Mr. Mhatre, learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks some time to take instructions from his client, within how much time, they will pay the said amount.

4. Registry is directed to place the matter on board on 22.03.2019.

[K. K. TATED, J.] 3/3 ::: Uploaded on - 22/03/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 22/03/2019 22:44:28 :::