Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

State Of Kerala vs C.H.Mohammed Kinhi on 20 September, 2007

Author: Harun-Ul-Rashid

Bench: Kurian Joseph, Harun-Ul-Rashid

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

LA App No. 498 of 2003(D)


1. STATE OF KERALA
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. C.H.MOHAMMED KINHI
                       ...       Respondent

2. C.H.ABDUL SALAM S/O. CHEMBARIKA ABDULLA,

3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, B.R.D.C., UDMA.

                For Petitioner  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

                For Respondent  :SRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice HARUN-UL-RASHID

 Dated :20/09/2007

 O R D E R
            KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ.
               -----------------------------------------
                       L.A.A. NO. 498 OF 2003
               -----------------------------------------
         Dated this the 20th day of September, 2007.


                           J U D G M E N T

Harun-Ul-Rashid, J.

This is an appeal filed by the State against the judgment and decree in L.A.R. No. 58/2000 dated 31.08.2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Kasaragod.

2. An extent of 0.1110 hectare of dry land in R.S. No. 74/3 and another extent of 0.0040 hectare of garden land in R.S. No. 74/5 of Udma Village, Kasaragod were acquired for Bakel Tourism Project. The last date of publication of Section 4(1) notification is 01.12.1996. Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs. 2,70,416/- per hectre as land value as against the claim of Rs. 20,000/- per cent.

3. The claimants contended that an amount of Rs. 19,500/- per cent was granted as negotiated rate for the adjacent property and therefore limited their claim to Rs. 19,500/- per cent inclusive of all the benefits under the Land Acquisition Act.

4. In support of the claim for enhanced compensation, on the side of the claimants the reference court examined AW1 and Exhibit A1. Exhibit R1 was marked on the side of the respondent. The reference court found that under the very same award, an amount of L.A.A. 498/03 2 Rs. 19,500/- was granted as negotiated rate to other claimants including the claimant whose property is situated adjacent to the acquired land. In the circumstances, reference court found that the claimants in this case are also entitled for Rs. 19,500/- each per cent and further held that this amount is inclusive of all the benefits which the claimants would otherwise be entitled had the compensation been not on negotiated rate.

We have examined the records and gone through the evidence of AW1 and the Commissioner's report. We are satisfied that the acquired property and the negotiated properties are lying side by side, adjacent to each other. Therefore, we are of the view that the fixation of land value at the rate of Rs. 19,500/- per cent inclusive of all benefits under the Land Acquisition Act is fair and reasonable. We find no merit in the appeal filed by the State and the appeal stands dismissed.

KURIAN JOSEPH JUDGE HARUN-UL-RASHID JUDGE smp L.A.A. 498/03 3 KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ.

L.A.A. NO. 498 OF 2003 J U D G M E N T 20.09.2007