Patna High Court - Orders
Himanshu Kr. Srivastwa & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 22 February, 2018
Author: Jyoti Saran
Bench: Jyoti Saran
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3540 of 2016
======================================================
1. Himanshu Kr. Srivastwa S/o Sri Sanjay Srivastwa resident of
Vishwamitra Colony, Buxar District Buxar.
2. Devdat Kr. Yadav S/o Sri Harishanker Prasad yadav Resident of Vilage
Sapahi Po Nimez District Buxar.
3. Shivjee Rai S/o Sri Kamla Rai Resident of Ghuruhupur Po Hathilpur
District Buxar.
4. Ashutosh Dubey S/o Sri Bhagwan Dwivedi Resident of Badki Basoli
District Buxar.
5. Ashish Kumar S/o Sri Pradeep Kumar./ Resident of Dumraon District
Buxar.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department,
Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The Mission Director of Bihar Prashashnik Sudhar Mission Society of
Patna.
4. The D.M. Buxar Bihar,.
5. The A.D.M. Buxar Bihar.
6. The A.D.M. (Establishment), Buxar Bihar.
.... .... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Chandra Shekhar Azad, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Apurv Harsh, AC to SC28
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN
ORAL ORDER
3 22-02-2018Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioners have questioned the advertisement for appointment of Executive Assistant under Bihar Prashasnik Sudhar Mission Society and also pray for staying the recruitment process which according to the petitioners was going on since 14.2.2016. The writ petition was filed on 19.2.2016.
In my opinion, that the advertisement was published in the year 2016, it is too late in the day to interfere therewith after a Patna High Court CWJC No.3540 of 2016 (3) dt.22-02-2018 2 lapse of almost two years. Further, paragraphs 6 and 7 of the counter affidavit shows that the appointment was for one year and that selection process was completed and panel prepared.
In he circumstances discussed no cause for indulgence is made out.
The writ petition is dismissed.
(Jyoti Saran, J) Surendra/-
U