Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

The Board Of Trustees Of The Port Of ... vs M.T.Royal Diamond 7 And 2 Others on 4 August, 2022

Author: N. J. Jamadar

Bench: N. J. Jamadar

                                                                                  13-comas-99-2015.doc




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                                    COMMERCIAL ADMIRALTY SUIT NO.99 OF 2015
                                                      WITH
                                     INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.23946 OF 2022

                      Board of Trustees of The Port of Mumbai              ...Plaintiff
                                 vs.
VISHAL                M.T. Royal Diamond and Others                        ...Defendants
SUBHASH
PAREKAR               Mr. Omprakash Jha i/b. The Law Point, for the Applicant/Plaintiff.
Digitally signed by
VISHAL SUBHASH        Mr. Prathamesh Kamat, Ms. Arshi Carol, Mr. Saurabh Patil, Mr.
PAREKAR
Date: 2022.08.04      Shantanu Joshi i/b. Harsh Pratap, for Defendant No. 3.
19:18:58 +0530


                                               CORAM :    N. J. JAMADAR, J.
                                               DATE :     AUGUST 04, 2022

                      P.C.:

                               IAL No.23946 of 2022 :-

                      1.       Heard the learned counsel for the applicant/plaintiff and the

                      learned counsel for the defendants.

                      2.       This application is taken out to amend the plaint so as to

                      incorporate the change in the name of the plaintiff post enactment

                      of Major Port Authorities Act, 2021 and also to scale down the value

                      of suit claim.

                      3.       The proposed amendment as regards the change in the name

                      of the plaintiff appears to be essentially consequential to the

                      legislative change brought about by enactment of Major Port

                      Authorities Act, 2021.

                      4.       The plaintiff also proposes to revise the suit claim as the


                      Vishal Parekar, P.A.                                                        ...1
                                                             13-comas-99-2015.doc




plaintiff has realized, post institution of the suit, that the claim is

required to be scaled down.

5.       Having regard to the nature of the proposed amendment,

there is no possibility of prejudice to the defendants. Hence, the

application deserves to be allowed. Thus, the following order.



                                      ORDER

1] The application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2] The plaintiff shall carry out the amendment in accordance with the Schedule appended to the application, including the revision in the Particulars of the Claim.

3] Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks and amended copy of the plaint be served on the defendants within one week thereafter.

List on 30th August, 2022.




                                            (N. J. JAMADAR, J.)




Vishal Parekar, P.A.                                                        ...2