Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Now Known As M/S. Empire And Singlo Tea ... vs Commissioner Of Income Tax on 30 September, 2015

Author: Soumitra Pal

Bench: Soumitra Pal

ORDER SHEET

                     IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

                           Special Jurisdiction
                               [Income Tax]

                               ORIGINAL SIDE

                              ITA 363 of 2005


                M/S. EMPIRE PLANTATIONS [INDIA] LTD.
         [Now known as M/s. Empire and Singlo Tea Limited]

                                   Versus

     COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL - I, KOLKATA & ANR.


    BEFORE:

    The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMITRA PAL

    The Hon'ble JUSTICE MIR DARA SHEKO

    Date : 30th September, 2015.


                                       Mrs. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, Adv.
                                               Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv.




              The Court : The instant appeal was admitted on the following

   substantial question of law :

                   " Whether on a true and proper interpretation of the scope of

                   Section 33AB of the Act the Tribunal was justified in law in

                   holding that the deduction under Section 33AB of the Act is

                   to be allowed only against the non-agricultural portion of the

                   income after apportionment of the composite income is

                   computed under Rule 8 of the Rules?
                                         2




      It is submitted by Mrs. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, learned advocate

appearing for the appellant/assessee that the question stands covered in favour

of the assessee in view of the judgement of the Calcutta High Court in

Goodricke Group Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Kolkata : 199 Taxman

243 (Calcutta) (MAG.)/[2011] 242 CTR 509 [Calcutta], which is not disputed by

Mr. Dudhoria, learned advocate appearing for the respondent/revenue.

Heard the learned advocates for the parties. In view of the judgement of the Calcutta High Court in Goodricke Group Ltd. [ supra ], the question is answered in the negative, against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.

The appeal is allowed.

(SOUMITRA PAL, J.) (MIR DARA SHEKO, J.) sm