Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Lala vs State on 1 December, 2018
Bench: P.K. Lohra, Vinit Kumar Mathur
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Criminal Writs No. 382/2018
Lala, S/o Kalu, B/c Meena, R/o Arniya Tamta Fala, PSs. Lasadiya
Dist. Udaipur.
(Lodged in Central Jail Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State, Through Secretary, Home Jaipur.
2. Collector, Udaipur.
3. Superintendent, Central Jail, Udaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : By post
For Respondent(s) : Mr. HS Gaur, Assistant to Mr. S.K.
Vyas, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 01/12/2018 Petitioner-convict has addressed a letter to the Registrar of this Court seeking first regular parole for 20 days and same is registered as a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The facts, in brief, are that petitioner-convict was subjected to trial for offence under Sections 302, 341 and 447 IPC and upon conclusion of trial, learned Additional Sessions Judge No.5, District Udaipur indicted him for the charged offences and handed down sentence of life term imprisonment with fine of Rs.11,000/-. After completion of the sentence of more than five years, petitioner applied for first regular parole of 20 days and the same was (2 of 3) [CRLW-382/2018] considered by District Level Parole Committee, Udaipur in its meeting dated 10.07.2018. However, the Committee by its decision dated 03.08.2018, declined prayer of the petitioner- convict solely on the ground that he is residing at a secluded place in a forest area. It is also noteworthy that the District Level Parole Committee has not at all taken into consideration the facts and circumstances, which were relevant and germane to the matter, including jail-conduct of the petitioner.
State, in its reply, has admitted that petitioner-convict has served substantive sentence of more than five years and if jail remission is included, it comes to more than five years and eight months. As regards the conduct of the petitioner, during incarceration, nothing adverse is reported against him.
In view thereof, upon consideration of the reply and the order passed by District Level Parole Committee, we are constraint to observe that the order declining first regular parole to the convict-prisoner is based on jejune ground, which is absolutely alien to the Rajasthan Prisoners (Release on Parole) Rules, 1958.
In view thereof, impugned decision dated 03.08.2018 is quashed and set aside qua the petitioner and petitioner-convict- prisoner Lala S/o Kalu, is directed to be released on first regular parole of 20 days from the date of his release, upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of competent jail authority.
(3 of 3) [CRLW-382/2018] It is needless to observe here that petitioner-convict shall surrender before the concerned jail authority after availing the parole of 20 days'.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (P.K. LOHRA),J
11-Bharti/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)