Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 100]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ramprakash Roj vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 March, 2019

Author: Arun Bhansali

Bench: Arun Bhansali

                                         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                                                          JODHPUR
                                                       S.B. Civil Writ No. 3286/2019

                                   Ramprakash Roj S/o Matu Ram Roj, Aged About 26 Years, Village
                                   And Post Chhajoli, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur (Raj.).
                                                                                                ----Petitioner
                                                                       Versus
                                   1.      State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of
                                           Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
                                   2.      The Director General Of Police, Government Of Rajasthan,
                                           Jaipur.
                                   3.      The Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur.
                                   4.      The District Education Officer Headquarter Secondary,
                                           Nagaur.
                                                                                          ----Respondents


                                   For Petitioner(s)       :     Mr. S.S. Choudhary.
                                   For Respondent(s)       :


                                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order 06/03/2019 The petitioner relies on judgment in Arun Choudhary & Ors. v. State & Ors. : SBCW No.5255/2013, decided on 11.08.2014.

In view of the submissions made, issue notice. Issue notice of stay application, returnable in three weeks.

Notices when issued be given 'dasti' to the petitioner/learned counsel for the petitioner.

In the meanwhile, the respondent No.3 is directed to relieve the petitioner from the post of Constable to join on the post of LDC without insisting for payment of refund of training expense/salary. However, the said relieving of the petitioner shall remain subject to the final outcome of the present writ petition.

Connect to SBCWP Nos.15437/2018 & 15812/2018.

(ARUN BHANSALI),J 179-PKS/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)