Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Neela Associates & 2 vs State Of Gujarat & 36 on 16 January, 2014

Author: Ravi R.Tripathi

Bench: Ravi R.Tripathi, Mohinder Pal

              C/LPA/852/2013                                       ORDER




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                   LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 852 of 2013
                                         In
                SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10520 of 2013
================================================================
                      NEELA ASSOCIATES & 2....Appellant(s)
                                   Versus
                     STATE OF GUJARAT & 36....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR PARTHIV B SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 - 3
MR ABHIJIT P JOSHI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 35 , 37
MR BHARAT T RAO, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 4 , 11 , 19
MR CB UPADHYAYA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 3
MR DAXAY D PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 12
MR MITUL K SHELAT, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 26 - 30
MS NALINI S LODHA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 36
RULE SERVED for respondents No. 1-2 , 5- 8 , 10 , 13 - 18 , 20 - 25 , 31 , 34
RULE UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 32 - 33
SERVED BY AFFIX.-(R) for the Respondent(s) No. 9
================================================================
          CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL
                       Date : 16/01/2014
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)

Learned advocate Mr.Parthiv B. Shah for the appellants sought priority in the matter. Priority was granted. The matter could not be taken up for paucity of time. Learned advocate Mr.Parthiv B. Shah requested that if the matter could be kept on earliest possible day. Learned advocate Mr.B.T. Rao appearing for respondents no.4, 11 and 19 requested that the matter be kept on 22.01.2014 as there is marriage in his family on 20th and 21st January 2014. The request is granted. The matter is kept on 22.01.2014.

(RAVI R.TRIPATHI, J.) Page 1 of 2 C/LPA/852/2013 ORDER (MOHINDER PAL, J.) karim Page 2 of 2