Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Madras High Court

P.Dharmarajan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 27 July, 2017

Bench: K.K.Sasidharan, G.R.Swaminathan

        

 

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT               

DATED: 27.07.2017  

CORAM   

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN            
and 
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN              

W.P.(MD)No.13746 of 2017   
and 
W.M.P.(MD).No.10730 of 2017   

P.Dharmarajan                           : Petitioner
Vs.

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, 
   Represented by its Secretary,
   Local Administration, Chennai.

2.The District Collector,
   Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
   Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.     

4.The Tahsildar,        
   Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.     

5.The Commissioner,  
   Nagercoil Municipality,
   Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.             : Respondents 

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records relating the
impugned notice dated 18.07.2017, under reference in Na.Ka.No.18623/2015/F1, 
issued by the fifth respondent with respect to the land in Sy.No.D5/11,
Anantha Samudhram Village, Nagercoil and quash the same.   

!For Petitioner         : Mrs.N.KrishnaVeni 
                                  Senior Counsel
                                  For Mr.P.Thiagarajan
For Respondents 1 to 4  : Mr.T.s.Mohamad Mohideen   
                                     Additional Government Pleader

        For Respondent No.5     : Mr.A.Adimoola Pandian 

:ORDER  

[Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.] The notice dated 18.07.2017 in Na.Ka.No.18623/2015/F1, issued by the fifth respondent has been questioned in this writ petition.

2.When the writ petition was taken up for final disposal, it was fairly admitted by the learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent that the subject property does not vest with the Municipality. Therefore, the fifth respondent did not have the jurisdiction to issue the impugned notice. On the ground of want of jurisdiction, the impugned notice dated 18.07.2017, issued by the fifth respondent is quashed. It is however made clear that it is open to the jurisdictional authority to take action in accordance with law.

3.The Writ Petition is allowed as indicated above. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

To

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Local Administration, Chennai.

2.The District Collector, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

4.The Tahsildar, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

5.The Commissioner, Nagercoil Municipality, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

.