Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 28]

Bombay High Court

Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thakarsey ... vs Miss. Aruna Manohar Dhanavade And Anr on 23 March, 2022

Author: A.S. Gadkari

Bench: A.S. Gadkari

Osk                                                       6-Rpw-20-2022.odt



                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                      REVIEW PETITION NO. 20 OF 2022
                                     IN
                   CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10645 OF 2019

Shreemati Nathibai Damodar
Thakarsey Women's University & Ors.               ... Petitioners
      V/s.
Miss. Aruna Manohar Dhanavade & Anr.              ... Respondents


                                   WITH
                      REVIEW PETITION NO. 21 OF 2022
                                     IN
                   CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 10737 OF 2019

Shreemati Nathibai Damodar
Thakarsey Women's University & Ors.               ... Petitioners
     V/s.
Samita Govind Takale & Anr.                       ... Respondents


Ms. Anjali Neel Helekar for Petitioners.
Mr. S.P. Chavan for Respondent No.1.
Ms. V.S. Nimbalkar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.2.


                                     CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 23rd March 2022.

P.C. :

1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners at length and the learned counsel for Respondent No.1 and the learned A.G.P. for Respondent No.2 (State).
1/2
Osk 6-Rpw-20-2022.odt
2. The present Review Petitions are filed for review of the Common Order dated 1st February 2022 passed in aforestated Writ Petitions. In para No.5 of the said Order, the Petitioners Management have been directed to deposit the back wages of the Respondent No.1 in this Court as granted to them with effect from 28/04/2017 till 28/02/2022 and from 04/05/2017 till 28/02/2022 respectively, on or before 15/03/2022.
3. Learned counsel for Review Petitioners submitted that, the Petitioners Management being an aided institution is ready and willing to deposit 50% of the said amount, however they are unable to deposit the entire amount.
4. The grounds which are not germane for deciding these Review Petitions were argued across the bar. Perusal of Order dated 1 st February 2022 would clearly indicate that, it is a speaking Order passed after hearing the learned counsel for the Petitioners and after taking into consideration various aspects of the matter including balancing the equities while granting interim protection to the Petitioners.

No case for review of Common Order dated 1 st February 2022 is made out.

5. Both the Review Petitions are accordingly dismissed.

OMKAR Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR [A.S. GADKARI, J.] SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN KUMBHAKARN Date: 2022.03.24 2/2 19:35:21 +0530