Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

.Badakala Umashankar Alias Buddu, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 7 September, 2020

Author: D.Ramesh

Bench: D.Ramesh

           THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

               CRIMINAL PETITION No.3675 of 2020

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR No.201 of 2020 on the file of the Ichapuram Rural Police Station, Srikakulam District. The offences alleged are under Sections 270, 273 r/w 34 of IPC and under section 20 (2) and 22 (b) of Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 [for short COTPA Act, 2003].

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this case is covered by the judgment passed by this Court in Criminal Petition No.2458 of 2020 with regard to the sections registered under 188, 269, 270, 273 IPC and under section 22 of COPTA Act, as far as section 51 of the Disaster Management Act,2005 is concerned, wherein Section 60 of the said Act clearly stipulates that "No Court shall take cognizance of an offence under this Act except on a complaint made by -

(a) the National Authority, the State Authority, the Central Government, the State Government, the District Authority or any other authority or officer authorised in this behalf by that Authority or Government, as the case may be; or

(b) any person who has given notice of not less than thirty days in the manner prescribed, of the alleged offence and his intention to make a complaint to the National 2 Authority, the State Authority, the Central Government, the State Government, the District Authority or any other authority or officer authorised as aforesaid. In view of the above position, in this case also there is no complaint lodged by any of the said authorities prescribed as above, police have directly registered the case. Therefore, the bar under section 60 of the Act also applies to the present facts of the case. If any complaint is made by the competent authority/person under the said Act, prescribed as above, the Court may take cognizance and proceed accordingly.

In view of the above discussion and in view of the judgment of this Court rendered in Criminal Petition No.2458 of 2020, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioners in FIR No.201 of 2020 on the file of the Ichapuram Rural Police Station, Srikakulam District, are hereby quashed.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

______________ D.RAMESH,J 07th September, 2020 Tsy