Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R Devarasan vs Commercial Tax Officer on 25 July, 2025

Author: C.Saravanan

Bench: C.Saravanan

                                                                                                    W.P.(MD) No.20302 of 2025

                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                    DATED: 25.07.2025

                                                             CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

                                           W.P.(MD) No. 20302 of 2025
                                                      and
                                       W.M.P.(MD) Nos.15711 & 15713 of 2025

        R Devarasan                                                                       ... Petitioner

                                                       Vs

        Commercial Tax Officer,
        Woraiyur Assessment Circle,
        Trichy 620 003.                                                                  ... Respondent


        PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
        issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the assessment
        proceedings in TIN 33783441368 / 2012- 13, dated 01.03.2017 and to quash this
        impugned order passed therein as illegal and against the statue and direct the
        respondent to file appeal against the revision orders in TIN 33783441368 / 2012-13,
        dated 17.11.2015.


                                   For petitioner      : Mr. C.Baktha Siromoni


                                   For respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar
                                                  Additional Government Pleader



                                                                *****

        1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                ( Uploaded on: 08/09/2025 10:20:49 pm )
                                                                                   W.P.(MD) No.20302 of 2025



                                                       ORDER

This Writ Petition is disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent.

2. The petitioner is approaching this Court belatedly against the Assessment Order, dated 01.03.2017 for the Assessment Year 2012-23. By the aforesaid order, the Return filed by the petitioner is rejected as incomplete and incorrect and the Assessment Order was made on best judgment in terms of Section 22 (2) of TNVAT Act, 2006 r/w Section 27 of TNVAT Act, 2006.

3. It appears that the aforesaid order had proceeded by an earlier order, dated 17.11.2015. The petitioner had neither filed an appeal against the earlier order, dated 17.11.2015 nor against the impugned order, dated 01.03.2017. However, the petitioner has filed similar appeals against the Assessment Orders preceded the impugned Assessment Order and the subsequent Assessment Orders pursuant to the order passed by this Court in W.A.(MD) No.119 & 166 to 171 of 2016, dated 12.02.2024 for the Assessment Years 2006-07 to 2011-12 and W.P.(MD) No.6415 of 2025, dated 17.03.2025 for the Assessment Years 2006-07 to 2013-14. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/09/2025 10:20:49 pm ) W.P.(MD) No.20302 of 2025

4. The specific case of the petitioner is that there is no scope for making assessment based on the Form-WW, which was introduced in the year 2012.

5. It is submitted that the requirement of filing Form-WW will be applicable only for the registered dealer having his principal place of business in the revenue Districts in Chennai, Kancheepuram, Tiruvallur, Cuddalore, Thoothukudi or Tirunelveli as per the proviso to Rule 16(A) of TNVAT Rules, 2007.

(*)6. The submission of the petitioner, insofar as interpretation placed on proviso to Rule 16(A) of the TNVAT Rules, 2007 is concerned, prima facie, appears to be incorrect and hence, the Assessment Order, dated 03.01.2017 is set aside. However, considering the fact that the petitioner has already filed an appeal for a period prior to the impugned Assessment Order and for the subsequent Assessment Orders, this Court is inclined to give similar liberty to the petitioner, subject to the petitioner depositing mandatory pre-deposit as required under the provisions of TNVAT Act, 2006. The appeal shall be filed against the Assessment Order, dated 17.11.2015, together with the pre-deposit within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/09/2025 10:20:49 pm ) W.P.(MD) No.20302 of 2025

7. This Writ Petition is disposed of, with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/-

25/07/2025 (*)Corrected as per order of this Court dated 22/08/2025 made in WP(MD)No. 20302 of 2025 Sd/-

Assistant Registrar (CS III) // True Copy // / /2025 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) apd To The Commercial Tax Officer, Woraiyur Assessment Circle, Trichy 620 003.

+1 CC to M/s.C.BAKTHA SIROMONI, Advocate ( SR-46194[F] dated 25/07/2025 ) 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/09/2025 10:20:49 pm ) W.P.(MD) No.20302 of 2025 +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-46525[F] dated 28/07/2025 ) W.P.(MD) No. 20302 of 2025 25.07.2025 MGJ (02.09.2025) 5P/ 4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/09/2025 10:20:49 pm )