Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 2]

Bombay High Court

Nilesh Uttam Nighot vs The State Of Maharashtra on 8 December, 2020

Author: Bharati Dangre

Bench: Bharati Dangre

                                 1/4                   26 BA-2632-18.doc


        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
             CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2632 OF 2018


Nilesh Uttam Nighot                        ..        Applicant
      Versus
The State of Maharashtra                   ..        Respondent
                                       ...

Mr.Sachin Pawar for the Applicant.

Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the State.


                 CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.
                 DATED : 8th DECEMBER, 2020

P.C:-

1.      On 9th May, 2018, the applicant is charge-sheeted in
C.R.No.80 of 2018 registered with Manchar Police Station,
Pune thereby invoking Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian
Penal Code.
        The complainant lodged a complaint on 23 rd February,
2018 alleging that she had visited the temple and spotted the
present applicant on his motorcycle. It is alleged that at around
1.45 p.m. when she was returning home, the applicant grabbed
her from behind and dragged her in a sugarcane field. It is
alleged that he pushed her on the ground, removed her clothes
and committed forcible sexual intercourse with her, against her
will. It is alleged that the applicant threatened her that if she
disclose the incident to any third person, he would kill her. She

M.M.Salgaonkar




  ::: Uploaded on - 10/12/2020                  ::: Downloaded on - 10/12/2020 22:19:14 :::
                                   2/4                       26 BA-2632-18.doc


narrated the incident to her husband, which resulted into the
registration of FIR. The applicant came to be arrested in the
said C.R. on 24th February, 2018 and since then he is
languishing in jail.


2.      With the assistance of the learned counsel for the
applicant and the learned APP, I have perused the charge-sheet.
The charge-sheet contain statements of witnesses, who have
narrated       the     version   of     the   prosecutrix     resulting        into
registration of FIR. The prosecutrix is aged 28 years and is
married.         During the course of investigation, her statement
under Section 164 is recorded before the Judicial Magistrate
First Class, Ghodegaon, Pune. She state that when she was
enroute her house, one person followed her and grabbed her
from behind.           She was dragged into a sugarcane field and
threatened that if she makes any voice, he would kill her. He
committed forcible sexual intercourse with her and then left
her. In her statement under Section 164, she state that she
went to the police station and there she came to know that the
name of the person is Nilesh Uttam Nighot.


3.      The case of the applicant is that the husband of the
prosecutrix has borrowed an amount of Rs.25,000/- from him
and in order to avoid the repayment, he has been falsely
implicated. The learned Additional Sessions Judge disbelieved
the said version since there is nothing on record to establish the
said fact. The statement of the prosecutrix clearly indict the

M.M.Salgaonkar




  ::: Uploaded on - 10/12/2020                       ::: Downloaded on - 10/12/2020 22:19:14 :::
                                  3/4                 26 BA-2632-18.doc


applicant. She was subjected to the medical examination on
the very same date when the alleged incident has taken place
i.e. on 23rd February, 2018 at 11.15 p.m. The medical report
except referring to a contusion of mid part of chest, do not
mention about any external visible injury.                The opinion
expressed is "According to her history, sexual violence has
occurred."         The position of law, in absence of injuries of
violence on prosecutrix, who alleged to have been sexually
assaulted, is well settled. There is no reason why the statement
of the prosecutrix cannot inspire confidence in the absence of
injuries.        The involvement of the applicant in the act
complained would be ascertained on the basis of the material
available in the charge-sheet, at the time of trial.
         On completion of investigation, charge-sheet is filed and
nothing remain to be recovered from the applicant.                   He is
incarcerated since 24th February, 2018 and it is almost 33
months, the applicant is incarcerated. By ensuring that he will
not in any way indulge with the prosecutrix or create pressure
upon her, the long incarceration entitle him to be released on
bail subject to the following conditions.
                                 : ORDER :

(a) Application is allowed.

(b) Applicant - Nilesh Uttam Nighot shall be released on bail in C.R.No.80 of 2018 registered with Manchar Police Station on furnishing P.R. M.M.Salgaonkar ::: Uploaded on - 10/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 10/12/2020 22:19:14 ::: 4/4 26 BA-2632-18.doc bond to the extent of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties of the like amount.

(c) The applicant will not enter Taluka Ambegaon, District Pune wehre the prosecutrix is residing, during the pendency of the trial.

(d)The applicant shall mark his attendance in the Sessions Court where the case is committed once in every two months and thereafter when the trial commence, he shall attend the trial on each and every date, unless exempted.

(e)The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Officer and shall not tamper with evidence.

4. The Application is disposed of in the aforestated terms.

SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J M.M.Salgaonkar ::: Uploaded on - 10/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 10/12/2020 22:19:14 :::