Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

V.Geetha vs District Collector

Author: Shaji P. Chaly

Bench: Shaji P.Chaly

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT:

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY

         MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/19TH POUSHA, 1938

                      WP(C).NO. 3838 OF 2014 (D)
                      ---------------------------


PETITIONER:
-------------

            V.GEETHA, W/O.  K.V. ULLAS,
            PROPRIETOR MATSYAFED FISH STALL, CIVIL STATION,
            KOLLAM, WARD NO.XXVI, HOUSE NO.135, RESIDING AT
            PADIYEZHATHU MADOM, KANNIMEL CHERRY,
            SAKTHIKULANGARA VILLAGE, KAVANADU P.O., KOLLAM.


            BY ADVS.SRI.K.SIJU
                    SRI.S.ABHILASH
                    SRI.PRATHEESH.P

RESPONDENTS:
--------------

          1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, CIVIL STATION,
            KOLLAM-691013.

          2. VILLAGE OFFICER, KOLLAM WEST VILLAGE, KOLLAM -691 013.

  * ADDL. R3 IS IMPLEADED:

           * DISTRICT OFFICER, MATSYAFED, CIVIL STATION,
            KOLLAM-691013 IS IMPLEADED AS ADDL.R3 AS PER ORDER DATED
            11.02.14 IN I.A. NO.2225/14.


            R1  BY ADV. SRI.RAKESH ROSHAN B/O
            R3  BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM, SC,MATSYAFED
            R1&R2  BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R. DEEPA
                    BY SRI.RAKESH ROSHAN, SC, MATSYAFED

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION  ON
09-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:



DST



                      SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
                  ----------------------------
                  W.P.(C) No.3838 of 2014
           ----------------------------------------
          Dated this the 9th day of January, 2017

                          JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the attempted illegal eviction of the petitioner from the shop room without issuing notice.

2. Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition is not pressed.

Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A.To Judge dlk/9/1/