Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Ramnivash vs The State Of Rajasthan on 27 September, 2023

Bench: Hrishikesh Roy, Sanjay Karol

     ITEM NO.34                                      COURT NO.9                         SECTION II

                                        S U P R E M E C O U R T O F              I N D I A
                                                RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                         SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 38128/2023

     (Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 06-09-2023 in
     SBCRMBA No. 10968/2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature for
     Rajasthan at Jaipur)

     RAMNIVASH                                                                           Petitioner(s)

                                                            VERSUS

     THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.                                                       Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.193245/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.193246/2023-EXEMPTION FROM
     FILING O.T. and IA No.193247/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION
     (SLP/TP/WP/..))

     Date : 27-09-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL

     For Petitioner(s)                        Mr. Namit Saxena, AOR
                                              Mr. Shivam Raghuwanshi, Adv.
                                              Mr. Vivek Hatheni, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)

                                 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

                                                         O R D E R

Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted. Heard Mr. Namit Saxena, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner (informant).

Assailing the bail granted to the second respondent (Smt. Mahendri) on the ground that she is a female accused, Mr. Saxena reads the FIR and also the statements under Section 161 Cr.P.C. of Signature Not Verified the injured Ravita and Meena (Annexure P/5 and Annexure P/6) to Digitally signed by NITIN TALREJA Date: 2023.10.07 09:19:03 IST Reason: point out that although female, the respondent No. 2 had played an 1 active role in gathering the three male members of the other family and arranged for their shooting through sharp shooters stationed in the roof of her own house.

Accordingly, it is argued that when it is a triple murder by professional killers, considering the active role of the female member of the assailant’s family, she should not have granted the benefit of bail by the High Court on the basis that she is a female.

Issue notice, returnable in four weeks.

The petitioner is permitted to serve Dasti notice additionally, on the Standing Counsel for the State of Rajasthan.

(NITIN TALREJA)                                 (KAMLESH RAWAT)
COURT MASTER (SH)                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR




                                 2