Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Murari Lal Soni vs Union Of India & Anr on 19 June, 2025

OD-05
                          WPO/189/2025
                   THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                 CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
                          ORIGINAL SIDE


                             Murari Lal Soni
                                  Versus
                           Union of India & Anr.


  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY
  Date: 19th June 2025

                                                               Appearance:
                                              Mr. Subash Agarwal, Advocate
                                              Mrs. Suman Sahani, Advocate
                                                          for the petitioner
                                                   Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate
                                                            for the respondent

The Court: 1. Challenging the order under section 154 read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act) dated 25th July 2024 for the assessment year 2013-14, the instant writ petition has been filed.

2. Mr. Agarwal, learned advocate appearing in support of the writ petition by drawing attention of this Court to the showcause notice and the response filed by the daughter-in-law of the assessee since deceased would submit that as on the date when the notice of proceeding was issued under section 154 of the said Act, the assessee had already expired. The factum of death of the assessee on 20 th March 2022 would corroborate from the death certificate of the assessee as appearing at page 36 of the writ petition. Mr. Agarwal would further submit that the Assessing Officer notwithstanding being aware on being put on notice as 2 regards the factum of death of the assessee had proceeded to pass the order impugned. According to Mr. Agarwal, the same is not sustainable in law and should be set aside.

3. Having heard the respective parties and noting that when the showcause notice was issued under section 154 of the said Act the assessee had died and the factum of death being within the notice of the Assessing Officer when the order dated 25th July 2024 was passed, in my view, the order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 154 of the said Act dated 25th July 2024 for the assessment year 2013-14 cannot be sustained, the same is accordingly quashed.

4. The aforesaid order shall, however, not stand in the way of the respondents from proceeding against the heirs of the assessee in accordance with law.

5. The writ petition being WPO/189/2025 is accordingly disposed of.

(RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.) R. Bose