Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Goa Foundation vs Union Of India . on 27 March, 2018

Bench: Madan B. Lokur, Deepak Gupta

     ITEM NO.3                     COURT NO.4                 SECTION PIL-W

                         S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     I.A. No. 87 in Writ Petition(s)(Civil)         No(s).   435/2012

     GOA FOUNDATION                                             Petitioner(s)

                                           VERSUS

     UNION OF INDIA . & ORS.                                    Respondent(s)

     WITH
     Reports of Expert Committee, Monitoring Committee

     Applicant:          Jayant Mohan

     Date : 27-03-2018       This application was called on for hearing
                             today.

     CORAM :                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

     For Petitioner(s)       Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. (A.C)[NP]

                             Ms. Aparajita Singh Adv. (A.C.)

                             Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv, (A.C.)
                             Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv.
                             Ms. Tulika Chikker, Adv.

                             Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Adv. (A.C.)

                             Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR

     For Respondent(s)       Mr.   A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG
                             Mr.   Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv.
                             Ms.   Arunima Dwivedi, adv.
                             Ms.   Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv.
                             Mr.   Ritesh Kumar, Adv.
                             Ms.   Daisy Hannah, Adv.
                             Ms.   Kasturika Kaumudi, Adv.
                             Ms.   Ekta Pradhan, Adv.
                             Mr.   Arvind Kr. Sharma, Adv.
                             Mr.   G.S. Makker, Adv.

                             Mr.   A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG
Signature Not Verified
                             Mr.   Merusagar Samantray, Adv.
                             Mr.   Salvedor Santosh Rebello, Adv.
Digitally signed by
MEENAKSHI KOHLI
Date: 2018.03.31
12:53:53 IST
Reason:                      Ms.   Lhingneivah, Adv.
                             Ms.   Snehaprabhu Tendulkar, Adv.


                                            1
                   Mr. Amogh Prabhu Desai, Adv.
                   Ms. Nivedita Nair, Adv.
                   Ms. Mayuri Chawla, Adv.

                   Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv.

                   Mr. S.N. Terdal, Adv.

                   Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv.

                   Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv.

                   Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Adv.
                   Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Adv.
                   Ms. Remya Raj, Adv.

                   Mr.   Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv.
                   Mr.   Ninad Laud, Adv.
                   Ms.   Anish Singh, Adv.
                   Mr.   Jayant Mohan, Adv.
                   Mr.   Anjuman Tripaty, Adv.
                   Mr.   Ivo D'costa, Adv.
                   Mr.   Aditya Swain, Adv.

                   Mr.   Yashraj Singh Deora, Adv.
                   Ms.   Swati Kamat, Adv.
                   Ms.   Ragya V. Singh, Adv.
                   Ms.   Asmita Singh, Adv.

                   Mr.   Bhavanishankar V. Gadnis, Adv.
                   Mr.   Vishwanath B. Gadnis, Adv.
                   Mr.   R. Mohan Pai Paikar, Adv.
                   Dr.   Prafulla, Adv.
                   Mr.   A Venayagam Balan, Adv.

                   Mr. Arvind Gupta, Adv.
                   Mr. Harish Pandey, Adv.
                   Mr. Sandeep Puggal, Adv.


        UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

                               O R D E R

Learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application in view of the fact that payments have been made to the Goan Iron Ore Permanent Fund pursuant to the show cause notice having been issued by the State of Goa.

2

However, learned counsel for the applicant says that the applicant may want to challenge the order directing payment to the aforesaid fund. The applicant is at liberty to do so at the appropriate forum.

We make it clear that so far as the applicant is concerned, no challenge can be raised without complying with the order passed by the State of Goa and making necessary payment, if not already made.

The application stands disposed of.





(MEENAKSHI KOHLI)                                   (KAILASH CHANDER)
     COURT MASTER                                        COURT MASTER




                                   3
ITEM NO.3                  COURT NO.4               SECTION PIL-W

                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

I.A. Nos. 88 & 90 in Writ Petition(s)(Civil)     No(s).     435/2012

GOA FOUNDATION                                          Petitioner(s)

                                   VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA . & ORS.                                 Respondent(s)

Applicant:       Geetabala Manohar Naik Parulekar & G.N. Agarwal

Date : 27-03-2018    These applications were called on for hearing
                     today.

CORAM :              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. (A.C)[NP] Ms. Aparajita Singh Adv. (A.C.) Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv, (A.C.) Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. Ms. Tulika Chikker, Adv.

Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, adv. Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Daisy Hannah, Adv.

Ms. Kasturika Kaumudi, Adv. Ms. Ekta Pradhan, Adv.

Mr. Arvind Kr. Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv.

Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Mr. Merusagar Samantray, Adv. Mr. Salvedor Santosh Rebello, Adv. Ms. Lhingneivah, Adv.

Ms. Snehaprabhu Tendulkar, Adv. Mr. Amogh Prabhu Desai, Adv. Ms. Nivedita Nair, Adv. Ms. Mayuri Chawla, Adv.

4

Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv.

Mr. S.N. Terdal, Adv.

Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv.

Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv.

Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Adv. Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Adv. Ms. Remya Raj, Adv.

Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ninad Laud, Adv.

Ms. Anish Singh, Adv.

Mr. Jayant Mohan, Adv.

Mr. Anjuman Tripaty, Adv. Mr. Ivo D'costa, Adv.

Mr. Aditya Swain, Adv.

Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, Adv. Ms. Swati Kamat, Adv.

Ms. Ragya V. Singh, Adv. Ms. Asmita Singh, Adv.

Mr. Bhavanishankar V. Gadnis, Adv. Mr. Vishwanath B. Gadnis, Adv. Mr. R. Mohan Pai Paikar, Adv. Dr. Prafulla, Adv.

Mr. A Venayagam Balan, Adv.

Mr. Arvind Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Harish Pandey, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Puggal, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the applications.

The applications are dismissed as withdrawn.





(MEENAKSHI KOHLI)                                   (KAILASH CHANDER)
     COURT MASTER                                        COURT MASTER


                                   5
ITEM NO.3                  COURT NO.4                SECTION PIL-W

                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

I.A. No. 107 in Writ Petition(s)(Civil)     No(s).   435/2012

GOA FOUNDATION                                          Petitioner(s)

                                   VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                   Respondent(s)

Applicant:       Dr. Prafulla R. Hede

Date : 27-03-2018    This application was called on for hearing
                     today.

CORAM :              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. (A.C)[NP] Ms. Aparajita Singh Adv. (A.C.) Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv, (A.C.) Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. Ms. Tulika Chikker, Adv.

Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, adv. Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Daisy Hannah, Adv.

Ms. Kasturika Kaumudi, Adv. Ms. Ekta Pradhan, Adv.

Mr. Arvind Kr. Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv.

Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Mr. Merusagar Samantray, Adv. Mr. Salvedor Santosh Rebello, Adv. Ms. Lhingneivah, Adv.

Ms. Snehaprabhu Tendulkar, Adv. Mr. Amogh Prabhu Desai, Adv. Ms. Nivedita Nair, Adv. Ms. Mayuri Chawla, Adv.

6

Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv.

Mr. S.N. Terdal, Adv.

Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv.

Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv.

Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Adv. Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Adv. Ms. Remya Raj, Adv.

Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ninad Laud, Adv.

Ms. Anish Singh, Adv.

Mr. Jayant Mohan, Adv.

Mr. Anjuman Tripaty, Adv. Mr. Ivo D'costa, Adv.

Mr. Aditya Swain, Adv.

Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, Adv. Ms. Swati Kamat, Adv.

Ms. Ragya V. Singh, Adv. Ms. Asmita Singh, Adv.

Mr. Bhavanishankar V. Gadnis, Adv. Mr. Vishwanath B. Gadnis, Adv. Mr. R. Mohan Pai Paikar, Adv. Dr. Prafulla, Adv.

Mr. A Venayagam Balan, Adv.

Mr. Arvind Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Harish Pandey, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Puggal, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application.

The application is dismissed as withdrawn.





(MEENAKSHI KOHLI)                                   (KAILASH CHANDER)
     COURT MASTER                                        COURT MASTER


                                   7
ITEM NO.3                  COURT NO.4               SECTION PIL-W

                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

I.A. Nos. 115 and 126180 in Writ Petition(s)(Civil)      No(s).
435/2012

GOA FOUNDATION                                          Petitioner(s)

                                   VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA . & ORS.                                 Respondent(s)

Applicant:       Ravindra Velip

Date : 27-03-2018    This application was called on for hearing
                     today.

CORAM :              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. (A.C)[NP] Ms. Aparajita Singh Adv. (A.C.) Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv, (A.C.) Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. Ms. Tulika Chikker, Adv.

Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, adv. Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Daisy Hannah, Adv.

Ms. Kasturika Kaumudi, Adv. Ms. Ekta Pradhan, Adv.

Mr. Arvind Kr. Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv.

Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Mr. Merusagar Samantray, Adv. Mr. Salvedor Santosh Rebello, Adv. Ms. Lhingneivah, Adv.

Ms. Snehaprabhu Tendulkar, Adv. Mr. Amogh Prabhu Desai, Adv. Ms. Nivedita Nair, Adv.

8

Ms. Mayuri Chawla, Adv.

Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv.

Mr. S.N. Terdal, Adv.

Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv.

Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv.

Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Adv. Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Adv. Ms. Remya Raj, Adv.

Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ninad Laud, Adv.

Ms. Anish Singh, Adv.

Mr. Jayant Mohan, Adv.

Mr. Anjuman Tripaty, Adv. Mr. Ivo D'costa, Adv.

Mr. Aditya Swain, Adv.

Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, Adv. Ms. Swati Kamat, Adv.

Ms. Ragya V. Singh, Adv. Ms. Asmita Singh, Adv.

Mr. Bhavanishankar V. Gadnis, Adv. Mr. Vishwanath B. Gadnis, Adv. Mr. R. Mohan Pai Paikar, Adv. Dr. Prafulla, Adv.

Mr. A Venayagam Balan, Adv.

Mr. Arvind Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Harish Pandey, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Puggal, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In view of our decision dated 07.04.2018, learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application.

The application is dismissed as not pressed.



(MEENAKSHI KOHLI)                                   (KAILASH CHANDER)
     COURT MASTER                                        COURT MASTER



                                   9
ITEM NO.3                  COURT NO.4               SECTION PIL-W

                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

I.A. No. 106518 in Writ Petition(s)(Civil)     No(s).     435/2012

GOA FOUNDATION                                           Petitioner(s)

                                   VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA   & ORS.                                 Respondent(s)


Date : 27-03-2018    This application was called on for hearing
                     today.

CORAM :              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. (A.C)[NP] Ms. Aparajita Singh Adv. (A.C.) Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Adv, (A.C.) Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv. Ms. Tulika Chikker, Adv.

Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, adv. Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Daisy Hannah, Adv.

Ms. Kasturika Kaumudi, Adv. Ms. Ekta Pradhan, Adv.

Mr. Arvind Kr. Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv.

Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, ASG Mr. Merusagar Samantray, Adv. Mr. Salvedor Santosh Rebello, Adv. Ms. Lhingneivah, Adv.

Ms. Snehaprabhu Tendulkar, Adv. Mr. Amogh Prabhu Desai, Adv. Ms. Nivedita Nair, Adv. Ms. Mayuri Chawla, Adv.

10

Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv.

Mr. S.N. Terdal, Adv.

Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv.

Mr. M.K. Maroria, Adv.

Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Adv. Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Adv. Ms. Remya Raj, Adv.

Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ninad Laud, Adv.

Ms. Anish Singh, Adv.

Mr. Jayant Mohan, Adv.

Mr. Anjuman Tripaty, Adv. Mr. Ivo D'costa, Adv.

Mr. Aditya Swain, Adv.

Mr. Yashraj Singh Deora, Adv. Ms. Swati Kamat, Adv.

Ms. Ragya V. Singh, Adv. Ms. Asmita Singh, Adv.

Mr. Bhavanishankar V. Gadnis, Adv. Mr. Vishwanath B. Gadnis, Adv. Mr. R. Mohan Pai Paikar, Adv. Dr. Prafulla, Adv.

Mr. A Venayagam Balan, Adv.

Mr. Arvind Gupta, Adv.

Mr. Harish Pandey, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Puggal, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Since mining has been stopped in the State of Goa, learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application.

The application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to revive, if it becomes necessary.

(MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (KAILASH CHANDER) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 11