Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Ms Ororun Barakat Ifeoluwa vs The Registrar (Evaluation) on 10 September, 2025

Author: R Devdas

Bench: R Devdas

                                                 -1-
                                                            NC: 2025:KHC:35818
                                                         WP No. 23983 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

                                              BEFORE
                                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
                           WRIT PETITION NO.23983 OF 2025 (EDN-RES)

                      BETWEEN:

                      MS ORORUN BARAKAT IFEOLUWA
                      D/O MR OLORUNMONSURU,
                      AGE ABOUT 21 YEARS
                      R/A NO 55, PATEL RAMA REDDY ROAD,
                      BASAVANAPURA, DODDAKAMMANAHALLI ,
                      BENGALURU-560083
                                                                 ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. REMMY CHIBUEZE IGWE, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE REGISTRAR (EVALUATION)
                            BANGALORE UNIVERSITY, MYSORE ROAD,
Digitally signed by         GNANABHARATHI, BENGALURU - 560056.
JUANITA THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF              2.
KARNATAKA                   M/S. IZEE COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT AND
                            INFORMATION SCIENCE,
                            REPRESENTED BY HER PRINCIPAL,
                            DR. SARAWASTHIKUMBLE,
                            PLOT NO. 325, PART A, BOMMASANDRA,
                            JIGANI LINK ROAD, JIGANI INDUSTRIAL AREA,
                            JIGANIPOST ANEKAL, BENGALURU-560105.
                                                                 ...RESPONDENTS
                      (BY SRI. CHAITANYA V JOSHI., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
                                -2-
                                          NC: 2025:KHC:35818
                                       WP No. 23983 of 2025


HC-KAR



     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A
WRIT OF MANDAMUS, ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE
RESPONDENT NO.1 TO EXPEDITIOUSLY UPDATE AND RELEASE
HER 2ND SEMESTER RESULT AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS
TO ISSUE THE PETITIONER, HER 2ND AND 6TH SEMESTER
MARKS CARDS FOR BACHELOR OF COMPUTER APPLICATION
(BCA), ALONG WITH TRANSCRIPT AND DEGREE CERTIFICATE
WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY TO ENABLE EXIT BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION OF HER VISA AND ETC.

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
                       ORAL ORDER

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner, who is a Nigerian national and had come to India on a student visa during October 2019, for the purpose of studying Bachelor of Computer Application (BCA) in the respondent No.2- Institution.

2. The petitioner contends that in the year 2020, she completed the requirements for the award of internal assessment for second semester of BCA and in fact, the Institution had awarded the marks for internal assessment. However, due to the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent lockdown, the second -3- NC: 2025:KHC:35818 WP No. 23983 of 2025 HC-KAR semester examination which was scheduled to be held during May-June 2020 was indefinitely called off. The first respondent thereafter issued a notification towards the payment of examination fee for the second semester examination.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the first respondent-University or the second respondent- Institution cannot deny the fact that the awarding of marks in the second semester was on the basis of the marks obtained in the internal assessment and no examinations were held. The grievance of the petitioner was regarding the collection of examination fee. However, the learned Counsel submits that the issue now is regarding the marks card and the fee which is sought to be collected by the second respondent for issuance of marks card.

4. Today learned Counsel for respondent No.1 submitted before this Court that the marks card of the petitioner is ready and the same will be forwarded to the -4- NC: 2025:KHC:35818 WP No. 23983 of 2025 HC-KAR second respondent-Institution and the petitioner has to collect the same from the second respondent-Institution.

5. Having regard to the facts narrated hereinabove, the writ petition stands disposed of, with a direction to the second respondent-Institution to furnish the marks card that would be given by the first respondent-University to the petitioner. The marks card shall be handed over by the second respondent to the petitioner within two days from the date when which the first respondent-University furnishes the marks card to the second respondent- Institution. If the second respondent has any further grievance, regarding fee towards marks card, it may approach this Court by filing an application but the marks card shall be tendered to the petitioner forthwith.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

(R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/-

CT: JL